The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 January 2011, 12:45 AM   #1
Bonesey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
1980 birthday sub

First post on these boards, still spending a lot of time absorbing the huge amount of information available! As a 35th birthday present to myself (a few years off yet) I was thinking about getting a black sub. I was tempted to purchase a new one that I could then hand on down to my son, but the idea of buying one from my own year of birth is tempting as well.

I'm not too fussed about condition as this would be a daily wearer, but of course has to be good internally. What sort of price am I looking at for a 35 year old Sub (with or without date)

Any advice/thoughts much appreciated. Thanks for your time

Rich.
Bonesey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 12:54 AM   #2
Rickster
"TRF" Member
 
Rickster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
Welcome to the forum!

I would say pick a budget might be the best way to go. There are so many options/styles/conditions etc etc all will reflect a different price. Take some time (months) and watch the classified section. You will begin to get an idea of what you can get for your money.

Rickster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 12:58 AM   #3
Bonesey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
Thanks for the advice, having thought, I'm not even sure 1980 classifies as 'Vintage'?

I have a budget in my head of £3.5-4.5k.
Bonesey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 01:04 AM   #4
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonesey View Post
Thanks for the advice, having thought, I'm not even sure 1980 classifies as 'Vintage'?

I have a budget in my head of £3.5-4.5k.
1980 Gets you into a 1680 Submariner (final year) or 5513. Price would fit too. The 1680 production run was late 1960s through to 1980, so getting a final year model would fit your requirements, and as the only difference between the 1980 model and the 1960s model is red/white writing and hacking, it definitely counts as a vintage model.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 08:43 AM   #5
Bonesey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
Just out of curiosity which would be the most desirable from a collectors point of view? I've had a look about and some of the 1980 role have some amazing patina and character. Looking forward to the chase towards my Grail watch now :)
Bonesey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 10:07 AM   #6
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
The one that makes you smile.

Its hard to look into the future to determine what will be "hot". Things change each year and there is always something that will become hot for some unknown reason. The 1680 is a classic and has a strong following. It should retain its value and increase over time. If the watch is for you then I would suggest getting the one that makes you smile when you try it on as that is the only thing that truly matters. Personally I like the date function as I never know what day it is. I also own a birth year 1680 from 1973.
__________________
1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 10:38 AM   #7
globoat
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 31
How well would a 1981 watch be running? Would it be decent but in need of servicing, or hacked up and patched up like a B? I always think about getting a watch of my birth year...
globoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 11:42 AM   #8
Badfish179
"TRF" Member
 
Badfish179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Snook
Location: USS Bluefish
Watch: Pam24, Seamaster
Posts: 883
Quote:
Originally Posted by globoat View Post
How well would a 1981 watch be running? Would it be decent but in need of servicing, or hacked up and patched up like a B? I always think about getting a watch of my birth year...
It should run great. I have a 5512 from 1963 and it runs perfectly and within COSC standards.
__________________
Truth will rise above falsehood as oil above water. - Miguel De Cervantes
Badfish179 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 12:14 PM   #9
Racer X
"TRF" Member
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 999
Quote:
Originally Posted by globoat View Post
How well would a 1981 watch be running? Would it be decent but in need of servicing, or hacked up and patched up like a B?
It depends upon when it was last serviced. Once serviced though, it should run great. My '69 sub is more accurate than my 2010 sub!
Racer X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 05:08 PM   #10
Poohsan
"TRF" Member
 
Poohsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
X3 Depends on the last service.
My (1973) Sub 1680 keeps better time than my (2002) Sub 16610. In addition I prefer the plastic crystal over sapphire as it shows fewer finger prints.
__________________
1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170
Poohsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 05:48 PM   #11
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
My '79 1680 averages +2/week on the wrist full-time. These vintage pieces tend to get more attention and love from watchmakers from their owners than modern watches do, which is probably why they're all regulated to perfection.

I get the feeling watchmakers themselves probably take a bit more care and effort in regulating vintage pieces, as they know what they're capable of and how impressive it is when an old watch outdoes its newer cousins.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2011, 10:56 PM   #12
conrail
"TRF" Member
 
conrail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
I'm also on the lookout for a 1980 (birth year) Sub, probably a 1680/0 or 5513. Very good choices! :)
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!"
conrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.