ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 January 2011, 12:45 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
|
1980 birthday sub
First post on these boards, still spending a lot of time absorbing the huge amount of information available! As a 35th birthday present to myself (a few years off yet) I was thinking about getting a black sub. I was tempted to purchase a new one that I could then hand on down to my son, but the idea of buying one from my own year of birth is tempting as well.
I'm not too fussed about condition as this would be a daily wearer, but of course has to be good internally. What sort of price am I looking at for a 35 year old Sub (with or without date) Any advice/thoughts much appreciated. Thanks for your time Rich. |
24 January 2011, 12:54 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
|
Welcome to the forum!
I would say pick a budget might be the best way to go. There are so many options/styles/conditions etc etc all will reflect a different price. Take some time (months) and watch the classified section. You will begin to get an idea of what you can get for your money. |
24 January 2011, 12:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
|
Thanks for the advice, having thought, I'm not even sure 1980 classifies as 'Vintage'?
I have a budget in my head of £3.5-4.5k. |
24 January 2011, 01:04 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
1980 Gets you into a 1680 Submariner (final year) or 5513. Price would fit too. The 1680 production run was late 1960s through to 1980, so getting a final year model would fit your requirements, and as the only difference between the 1980 model and the 1960s model is red/white writing and hacking, it definitely counts as a vintage model.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
24 January 2011, 08:43 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10
|
Just out of curiosity which would be the most desirable from a collectors point of view? I've had a look about and some of the 1980 role have some amazing patina and character. Looking forward to the chase towards my Grail watch now :)
|
24 January 2011, 10:07 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
|
The one that makes you smile.
Its hard to look into the future to determine what will be "hot". Things change each year and there is always something that will become hot for some unknown reason. The 1680 is a classic and has a strong following. It should retain its value and increase over time. If the watch is for you then I would suggest getting the one that makes you smile when you try it on as that is the only thing that truly matters. Personally I like the date function as I never know what day it is. I also own a birth year 1680 from 1973.
__________________
1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170 |
24 January 2011, 10:38 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 31
|
How well would a 1981 watch be running? Would it be decent but in need of servicing, or hacked up and patched up like a B? I always think about getting a watch of my birth year...
|
24 January 2011, 11:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Snook
Location: USS Bluefish
Watch: Pam24, Seamaster
Posts: 883
|
It should run great. I have a 5512 from 1963 and it runs perfectly and within COSC standards.
__________________
Truth will rise above falsehood as oil above water. - Miguel De Cervantes |
24 January 2011, 12:14 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 999
|
|
24 January 2011, 05:08 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Arron
Location: phoenix, AZ
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 764
|
X3 Depends on the last service.
My (1973) Sub 1680 keeps better time than my (2002) Sub 16610. In addition I prefer the plastic crystal over sapphire as it shows fewer finger prints.
__________________
1680, 1675, 116610LN, GMT Master II, Explorer II, Tudor Big Block 79170 |
24 January 2011, 05:48 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
My '79 1680 averages +2/week on the wrist full-time. These vintage pieces tend to get more attention and love from watchmakers from their owners than modern watches do, which is probably why they're all regulated to perfection.
I get the feeling watchmakers themselves probably take a bit more care and effort in regulating vintage pieces, as they know what they're capable of and how impressive it is when an old watch outdoes its newer cousins.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
24 January 2011, 10:56 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
I'm also on the lookout for a 1980 (birth year) Sub, probably a 1680/0 or 5513. Very good choices! :)
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.