ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 February 2012, 01:38 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 8
|
Buckle vs folding clasp
Hi all - I'm about to purchase a Cellini 5241/6, and I have the option of getting the traditional belt-buckle style fastener, or the platinum "folding clasp" (extra $2k).
Besides price, is the folding clasp inferior in any way? e.g. -- will it break more easily, or come off if I happen to hit my arm against something compared to the traditional buckle? Any input on the pro/cons of each of these would be great! Thanks :) |
22 February 2012, 01:42 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
Not sure how sturdy the folding clasp will be, I am sure more experts will chime in soon. But, as far as I know, the folding clasp tend to stretch out the leather less.
|
22 February 2012, 02:09 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: 1675
Posts: 1,162
|
The folding clasp will cause less wear to the leather strap but with 2K you can buy enough leather straps to last for 30+ years given a leather strap typically lasts 2 -3 years depending on how you take care of it. Besides you can buy a nice non-Rolex strap (like a Hirsch) and use the same buckle for probably 1/4 of the price of the Rolex strap and will give you more choices if you want to change up the look; a non-Rolex strap for the folding clasp may be a little harder to come by.
|
22 February 2012, 02:24 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
The buckle is probably much better if you don't want to spend much more on the watch (as stated, you can buy other leather bands if yours get too used) but I think there's something special in a clasp and if I had the budget I would probably spoil myself a little bit with it.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
22 February 2012, 03:49 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Folding clasps are a smart way to reduce the risk of dropping your watch.
|
22 February 2012, 05:42 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
As stated previously a folding clasp will reduce risk of dropping and wear on the strap. Buckles are a hassle comparatively. Folding clasp is the way to go, but for $2K..... ouch.
__________________
|
22 February 2012, 05:50 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: 1675
Posts: 1,162
|
|
22 February 2012, 09:06 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Quote:
The folding clasp is also easier to work with in my opinion.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
22 February 2012, 10:00 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: singapore
Watch: cosmograph daytona
Posts: 388
|
definitely folding clasp
|
22 February 2012, 10:21 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Canada
Watch: milgaus gv
Posts: 284
|
The life of a leather strap with buckle is about a year. With folding clasp it's four to five years.
|
22 February 2012, 10:49 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Saudi Arabia
Watch: Rolex 16710 LN
Posts: 18
|
I had the same dilema when I wanted to replace the bracelet by a leather strap for a Speedmaster. I finally went for the traditional buckle because the price. I found out that there is a relative advantage with this option: you can easily tighten or loosen the strap according to the apparent changes in your wrist size over the day.
|
22 February 2012, 11:05 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
Being a fan of minimalism, I like simple tang (or "Ardillon" if you prefer) buckles to deployants. The latter are fancier and do reduce the risk of dropping, but I like the notably flatter profile of tang buckles, and I think they are more classical--to say nothing of more secure once they are done up. Worried about dropping? Slow down a second, or just sit down to do your watch up. It'll take what...all of 10 seconds?
Deployants can be rather weak in engagement (have seen this on AP deployants more than once) and the blades can poke and be uncomfortable against the wrist, too. Price has been mentioned already, so there's no need to go there. If I want something that folds, it'll be connected to a metal bracelet. |
23 February 2012, 12:06 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,688
|
x2
I use both buckle and deployant on vrious watches. The biggest reasons I use the deployants is to reduce the chance of dropping the watch and ease of wearing. 2k for a deployant is pretty amazing, and, for me, not the place to put my money.
Last edited by slcbbrown; 23 February 2012 at 12:07 AM.. Reason: spellig |
23 February 2012, 12:23 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Canada
Watch: milgaus gv
Posts: 284
|
I was quoted a price of $3200. to $4000. for a Patek deployment clasp. Went to a local jewellers and paid $30. to have a gold plated deployment clasp put on. It looks and works great. Probably sacrilege to some but I'd rather save and put the money towards a new watch.
|
23 February 2012, 03:45 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,688
|
Rhd
Quote:
|
|
23 February 2012, 05:04 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Adam
Location: Texas
Watch: G-Shock!
Posts: 383
|
I have quit wearing buckles on leather straps. The straps seem to last longer with a clasp.
|
24 February 2012, 03:24 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 8
|
I decided to go with the buckle, mainly (besides price) because it allows for size adjustment in case I get fatter and also doesn't have the pinching risk :)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.