ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 May 2012, 12:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Some 5711 Enabling Please...
Did I just say that out loud ?
All of these Nautilus posts are getting me Thinking maybe (that was a big MAYBE Dan) that 5711 would be a nice addition. Can't go wrong with the classic that is Nautilus. If not now, certainly high on the future list. I don't know I am even asking this one, but I assume the classic PP blue dial will be the preferred choice over white |
16 May 2012, 12:54 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
Paul, please! Do you think we have the time to enable someone to a Patek Nautilus?
...Oops! ...Oh dear, I'm sorry! ...Now this is embarrassing! ...What's going on in here? ...What the hell is happening!? Now of course, these aren't my pictures, I'll let people show their very own soon, this was just the beginning...
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
16 May 2012, 12:56 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Paul, if you like thicker/bigger watches maybe the 5980/1A is a better choice. Or the upcoming 5726/1A (I want this one). Don't get me wrong, I LOVE my 5711/1A but it wears small/thin. It takes some getting used to.
As for blue vs white. I think the new white dial imparts a modern sportiness to the line while blue is classier. Given the thinness of the 5711, I prefer the classy blue. Now if they had used WG marker surrounds instead of black... different story. On the sportier/thicker 5980, I prefer white - the different color subdial on the blue is distracting (although it works better on the 5980R). |
16 May 2012, 01:01 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
White dialed Nautilus
Photo credited to Piercy (PCS) |
16 May 2012, 01:06 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 571
|
white dial not so gr8 i prefer blue dial
|
16 May 2012, 01:11 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
I think the white dial has its charm but I'll agree with you, the blue is unique and you can't beat its beauty.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
16 May 2012, 01:12 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Comparison of blue vs white 5711/1A
Photo credited to Howard Parr |
16 May 2012, 01:15 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
blueeeeeee
|
16 May 2012, 01:19 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Lume's pretty good also.
|
16 May 2012, 01:20 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
One of my favorite pieces.
|
16 May 2012, 01:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 571
|
which is ur next patek.. paul and dan?
|
16 May 2012, 02:29 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
I need to take a closer look at these Mike. Do you have 5726 MSRP? Will report back, as I do like a little more 'beef'. |
|
16 May 2012, 02:34 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Quote:
I think if it is right for you, you will know. But I would advise taking a look at the various options in person first if possible. There is a difference in case size which can't always be appreciated until seen. In the last couple of months I think I have been able to see most of the SS versions with the exception of the 5711 at the ADs I have visited.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
16 May 2012, 02:35 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
|
16 May 2012, 02:37 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
|
16 May 2012, 03:03 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
Paul...
BLUE! you got the FEVER! LOL
__________________
too much into watches... |
16 May 2012, 04:43 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
|
16 May 2012, 05:11 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
So I am hearing blue...on 5711.
Mike that 5726 is very temping, but $$. Let the contemplating continue.... |
16 May 2012, 05:20 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
Paul, go for the 5980... why not? it's just money.... a piece of paper lol
|
16 May 2012, 05:52 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Does the 5711 wear about like the 5167?
|
16 May 2012, 05:58 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Keep in mind the same movement is being used, so the case is probably about the same thickness, but I think the 5711 is a bit wider because of the ears. Of course the 5711 is on a bracelet and your 5167 is on a rubber strap.
So yes, I would say given some minor differences it's pretty close.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 May 2012, 06:45 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
Maybe too small. |
|
16 May 2012, 08:02 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Paul I would classify the 5711 as very classy sports watch. not unlike the 5617.
The 5980 is quite a bit bigger in that the case is quite a bit thicker because of the movement. Has a much bigger wrist presence. But it's also about twice the cost of a 5711. The only other that I remember for sure is the 5712 which isn't that much more than the 5711, but then again the case size is about the same size of the 5711.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 May 2012, 08:15 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
The 5711 is indeed a very thin watch. It is especially very thin if you consider it a sports (or sporty) watch. The whole thing (very thin watch case + thin & light bracelet) looks very weird on the wrist after wearing diving watches like the Submariner or Omega Planet Ocean. So make sure to try the 5711 on before making a decision. It could be difficult though, since most Patek ADs have no 5711 on stock due to "artifically" limited production. It's not a limited edition, but the market would require much more annually than what Patek makes. It may be much easier to find an Aquanaut to try on.
Fortunately as others suggested, there's always a way if you think the 5711 is too thin. 5726 and 5980 are both great choices, although quite a bit more expensive than the 5711.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
16 May 2012, 08:15 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2012, 08:32 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Quote:
Either way, I think the white dial more than likely will be a bit difficult to get a hold of for awhile, that is once it come out. I really do think it best to try either out first in person if your having doubts about the size of the watch.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
19 May 2012, 02:15 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
This watch can only really be appreciated in person... Very comfortable... I love the thin and slim design of this watch...
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
19 May 2012, 02:37 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Great PICs Kevin, thanks for sharing.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
19 May 2012, 05:27 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
What a beautiful duo
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
19 May 2012, 11:27 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Sounds like I'm the only one around who votes for the white (though haven't seen it in person). I've had blue watches, including the Royal Oak, & always felt they were too matchy matchy with jeans. Probably ridiculous, but for $26K I don't want to deal with any buyer's remorse.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.