ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 June 2014, 06:09 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phila Metro
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 80
|
Watch size vs Pics
I'm sure I'm just weird but after viewing so many pics of watches... especially the subs the one I have on my wrist (16610LV) seems to look small.
I'm sure it's just the effect of seeing so many close up pics but does that happen to anyone else? Joe |
18 June 2014, 06:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 1,514
|
yes....
|
18 June 2014, 06:15 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
well it is a matter of perspective and frame of reference
most (me) show relatively close up pics of the watch so all can see the beautiful detail, probable because it is a watch forum not a wrist or body forum would look at some of the pics on the what are you wearing threads for a better frame of reference for example this pic…. becomes this, top for reference bottom for better detail…. |
18 June 2014, 06:18 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
I will never get tired of seeing your watch....... |
|
18 June 2014, 07:47 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,305
|
I always reduce my page zoom to a realistic size when I am seriously thinking about buying a watch.
|
18 June 2014, 08:10 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,499
|
Just like Mick Jagger and the Taj Mahal.....Rolex watches always look smaller than expected in person.
|
18 June 2014, 08:43 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
|
Yes I understand what you're saying. Tom's thoughts on the matter sum it up well.
|
18 June 2014, 08:57 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,305
|
|
18 June 2014, 09:05 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: HSV / ANC
Watch: 126660
Posts: 626
|
Very timely. I was in an AD in Huntsville, AL today to see a GMT-Master II, and was really taken aback by it's diminutive size. My own perspective has shifted no doubt from wearing the Exp II night and day.
|
18 June 2014, 10:01 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
|
Yep same with me. Close up pictures make a watch look large then when you get to handle one its like, oh...
|
18 June 2014, 11:04 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
|
18 June 2014, 12:03 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Michael
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Watch: 116613LB
Posts: 115
|
|
18 June 2014, 12:17 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
OP: does this mean that you bought a Sub solely based on photos on the interwebs? When I buy a watch I'm never surprised by the size because by the time I get it I've already tried it on numerous times in AD's. Edit: just re-read your post, I understand what you meant now |
|
18 June 2014, 12:23 PM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 16570
Posts: 34,365
|
Bear in mind that you may be somewhat bigger than average and that this is an international board and that some pictures may be of those who are somewhat smaller than average.
Sometimes when I see a wrist shot, I think that the watch looks to be about 60mm, when I know that it's really 40mm. That's because I'm accustomed to seeing the same watch on my own wrist, which is about 7.75".
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
18 June 2014, 12:36 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
18 June 2014, 03:06 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
The platona looks fantastic tom!
|
18 June 2014, 05:12 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Ken
Location: Home
Watch: 116520
Posts: 134
|
Big or small, Rolexes always look great on your wrist.
|
18 June 2014, 05:21 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Fabian
Location: California
Posts: 462
|
Wow, that first shot is great!
Light, color, and angle really bring out the beauty of your watch. Quote:
|
|
18 June 2014, 06:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
|
Watches always look bigger in photographs than in person. I was amazed at how small my 16600 really was when I first put it on.
But when I take wristshots, it always seems to look bigger than it is, even though I have quite thick wrists.
__________________
Don't drink out of ornamental ponds in Tiergarten. You will get sick. |
18 June 2014, 10:44 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Phila Metro
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 80
|
Ok, cool it's not just me...
I had gone to an AD to look before buying but they only had the new ceramic models. My first reaction was ""ow are the older models so much smaller?!?!" Then I figure out it was the perspective of the shots and relaxed... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.