ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

WatchKit · 1 November 2016, 10:28 AM

So what do you AP fanatics think of this new watch? It is the new Royal Oak Skeleton Double Balance Wheel in all Rose Gold. 41mm

brettpaul · 2 November 2016, 10:36 PM

It's a real beauty, but personally prefer the 39mm ultrathin - 15204OR...have you seen/tried that one?

Only 200 for the world so hurry!

AshAP · 2 November 2016, 11:13 PM

It's amazing, quite expensive and demand is greater than supply.

singe89 · 2 November 2016, 11:14 PM

Love it but slightly prefer the original 15305or. Dimensions and dial (without the gold balance wheel) look a little more balanced.

911Cab · 2 November 2016, 11:15 PM

The AP skeletons are considered one of the best made in the world thus demand is high and AP keeps supply very low.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

VICI · 3 November 2016, 08:47 AM

Expecting mine early next year. I chose the stainless for a change.

texex91 · 3 November 2016, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VICI

Expecting mine early next year. I chose the stainless for a change.

EXCITING ALEX!

Hairdude1 · 3 November 2016, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VICI

Expecting mine early next year. I chose the stainless for a change.

benlee · 3 November 2016, 10:34 AM

It's a gorgeous piece. I have seen it irl. Although for the money, I think mine is a slightly better value and 39mm is a better size for me. What's missing is the golden bridge. Not sure about the claims of better accuracy but it's not that important for me.

Here's my 15305OR after adding the RG bracelet :

and here is a side by side shot between the two RG Skeletons :

911Cab · 3 November 2016, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VICI

Expecting mine early next year. I chose the stainless for a change.

WoW ! Lucky Bastard !

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

masyv6 · 4 November 2016, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benlee

It's a gorgeous piece. I have seen it irl. Although for the money, I think mine is a slightly better value and 39mm is a better size for me. What's missing is the golden bridge. Not sure about the claims of better accuracy but it's not that important for me.

Here's my 15305OR after adding the RG bracelet :

and here is a side by side shot between the two RG Skeletons :

Amazing photos

GB-man · 4 November 2016, 04:36 AM

This thread

AK797 · 4 November 2016, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benlee

It's a gorgeous piece. I have seen it irl. Although for the money, I think mine is a slightly better value and 39mm is a better size for me. What's missing is the golden bridge. Not sure about the claims of better accuracy but it's not that important for me.

Here's my 15305OR after adding the RG bracelet :

and here is a side by side shot between the two RG Skeletons :

Beautiful pics, looks amazing on the bracelet.

Tourbeon · 4 November 2016, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benlee

It's a gorgeous piece. I have seen it irl. Although for the money, I think mine is a slightly better value and 39mm is a better size for me. What's missing is the golden bridge. Not sure about the claims of better accuracy but it's not that important for me.

Here's my 15305OR after adding the RG bracelet :

and here is a side by side shot between the two RG Skeletons :

What a beauty!

watchucallit · 5 November 2016, 01:00 AM

I love my steel version. I was in florence italy last week and the AP dealer or boutique there had a gold version in stock

WatchKit · 5 November 2016, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchucallit

I love my steel version. I was in florence italy last week and the AP dealer or boutique there had a gold version in stock

How did it look??

Lordofrolex · 5 November 2016, 02:22 PM

Either way your good. Both great watches.

Amiricanmade · 5 November 2016, 03:06 PM

Q: can a gold bracelet from a 41 26320OR fit on the 39 Skeleton????

jjnd08 · 5 November 2016, 07:37 PM

Definitely a beautiful watch!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Amiricanmade · 7 November 2016, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amiricanmade

q: Can a gold bracelet from a 41 26320or fit on the 39 skeleton????

+1?

watchbowl · 8 November 2016, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amiricanmade

Q: can a gold bracelet from a 41 26320OR fit on the 39 Skeleton????

I don't think so. I think you need the bracelet from the 15202OR unless it's the same?

The B · 9 November 2016, 06:35 AM

I am looking forward to seeing it! I have a deposit on a SS one, don't expect it until late next year - I'm interested that AP designed new technology and made it skeleton.

I am also expecting to recieve my 15204 Extra Thin by year end. For me; the metal used, size of case and the movement (history and date fundction) make them completely different watches for different times. However, my wife uses this exact example to make her point about some claim of insanity on my part....

lapince · 9 November 2016, 07:32 AM

It looks amazing

Quote:

Originally Posted by The B

I am looking forward to seeing it! I have a deposit on a SS one, don't expect it until late next year - I'm interested that AP designed new technology and made it skeleton.

I am also expecting to recieve my 15204 Extra Thin by year end. For me; the metal used, size of case and the movement (history and date fundction) make them completely different watches for different times. However, my wife uses this exact example to make her point about some claim of insanity on my part....

A 15204 and a 15407ST? Lucky man...

Amiricanmade · 10 November 2016, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon040289

I don't think so. I think you need the bracelet from the 15202OR unless it's the same?

So AP Clearwater first said it is the same, but when i called again to confirm they said no.

I'm not sure if you guys know Anil Arjandas but i'm curious because of the below post in which he took the bracelet of the 39ROC and it fit on the 41ROC. So i would assume its the same going from 41 ROC to a 39 ROC?

watchbowl · 10 November 2016, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amiricanmade

So AP Clearwater first said it is the same, but when i called again to confirm they said no.

I'm not sure if you guys know Anil Arjandas but i'm curious because of the below post in which he took the bracelet of the 39ROC and it fit on the 41ROC. So i would assume its the same going from 41 ROC to a 39 ROC?

Interesting! 39 ROC on bracelets are super rare!

Amiricanmade · 10 November 2016, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amiricanmade

So AP Clearwater first said it is the same, but when i called again to confirm they said no.

I'm not sure if you guys know Anil Arjandas but i'm curious because of the below post in which he took the bracelet of the 39ROC and it fit on the 41ROC. So i would assume its the same going from 41 ROC to a 39 ROC?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon040289

Interesting! 39 ROC on bracelets are super rare!

D33oh, HI. I'm a big fan!

Did you get your 39 with the watch from factory or source it yourself?

The B · 10 November 2016, 10:34 AM

Yes - first world problems, really the SS is so far out (about a full year) who knows what will happen by then...

thurgood · 12 November 2016, 12:59 PM

As Ben and Jim said, the 39mm is much more balanced in size. The gold balance wheel on the 15407 is a bit off to me

1 November 2016, 10:28 AM	#1
WatchKit "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Gainesville Posts: 75	15407.OR thoughts So what do you AP fanatics think of this new watch? It is the new Royal Oak Skeleton Double Balance Wheel in all Rose Gold. 41mm

2 November 2016, 10:36 PM	#2
brettpaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Brett Location: Bahrain, Dubai Watch: Rolex and AP Posts: 5,538	It's a real beauty, but personally prefer the 39mm ultrathin - 15204OR...have you seen/tried that one? Only 200 for the world so hurry! __________________ Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain

3 November 2016, 10:34 AM	#9
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,873	It's a gorgeous piece. I have seen it irl. Although for the money, I think mine is a slightly better value and 39mm is a better size for me. What's missing is the golden bridge. Not sure about the claims of better accuracy but it's not that important for me. Here's my 15305OR after adding the RG bracelet : and here is a side by side shot between the two RG Skeletons : __________________ Follow me on Instagram : benlee789

5 November 2016, 02:22 PM	#17
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,690	Either way your good. Both great watches. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

5 November 2016, 07:37 PM	#19
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,605	Definitely a beautiful watch! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ ---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches

2 November 2016, 11:13 PM	#3
AshAP "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ash Location: UK Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 4,544	It's amazing, quite expensive and demand is greater than supply.

2 November 2016, 11:14 PM	#4
singe89 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Jim Location: Orange County, CA Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek Posts: 3,724	Love it but slightly prefer the original 15305or. Dimensions and dial (without the gold balance wheel) look a little more balanced.

2 November 2016, 11:15 PM	#5
911Cab Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: USA Posts: 560	The AP skeletons are considered one of the best made in the world thus demand is high and AP keeps supply very low. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 November 2016, 08:47 AM	#6
VICI "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Gotham City Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC Posts: 5,672	Expecting mine early next year. I chose the stainless for a change.

4 November 2016, 04:36 AM	#12
GB-man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 36,910	This thread

5 November 2016, 01:00 AM	#15
watchucallit "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: San Fran Posts: 2,214	I love my steel version. I was in florence italy last week and the AP dealer or boutique there had a gold version in stock

5 November 2016, 03:06 PM	#18
Amiricanmade "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Real Name: NONYA Location: Newport Beach, CA Watch: Many Posts: 252	Q: can a gold bracelet from a 41 26320OR fit on the 39 Skeleton????

9 November 2016, 06:35 AM	#22
The B "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: USA Posts: 221	I am looking forward to seeing it! I have a deposit on a SS one, don't expect it until late next year - I'm interested that AP designed new technology and made it skeleton. I am also expecting to recieve my 15204 Extra Thin by year end. For me; the metal used, size of case and the movement (history and date fundction) make them completely different watches for different times. However, my wife uses this exact example to make her point about some claim of insanity on my part....

10 November 2016, 10:34 AM	#27
The B "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: USA Posts: 221	Yes - first world problems, really the SS is so far out (about a full year) who knows what will happen by then...

12 November 2016, 12:59 PM	#28
thurgood "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Scott Location: West coast Watch: PP/AP/ROLEX Posts: 391	As Ben and Jim said, the 39mm is much more balanced in size. The gold balance wheel on the 15407 is a bit off to me

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)