ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

kangajack · 28 September 2017, 06:52 AM

216570 is my choice every day of the week. All those 40mm or nothing people are either jealous, or have a Napoleon Complex.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

toomuchtalk · 29 September 2017, 01:17 AM

I own both. I think if I had to choose though I would go 40mm. The 5 digit cases are just a better fit to the wrist.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

218225 · 29 September 2017, 01:34 AM

I love my 39mm 1655 for its elegance and comfort but prefer my 42 mm expII. The bigger dial makes it much easier too read and I love the orange hand over de 40mm red hand.
And I have the size too get the proportions right.

Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro

dberman3 · 29 September 2017, 01:38 AM

My original plan was the 16570 but ended up going with the 216570 first. So then I went to buy the 16570 last month as I have a few other 40mm models that I love and love the way they fit, but couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger. After wearing it for the past year or two, I really love the 216570.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Quicksilver · 29 September 2017, 01:45 AM

I had the 42mm Polar and flipped it for the 40mm. I don't think the 42mm is too big but I'm not a fan of the thicker hands and dial plots. The 40mm is just a bit more elegant for me. If I were to go 42mm again I would chose the black.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SFBAY · 29 September 2017, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dberman3

My original plan was the 16570 but ended up going with the 216570 first. So then I went to buy the 16570 last month as I have a few other 40mm models that I love and love the way they fit, but couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger. After wearing it for the past year or two, I really love the 216570.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Looks great! What size is your wrist?

29 September 2017, 01:45 AM	#35
Quicksilver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: David Location: London+Guangzhou Watch: ing watches Posts: 2,603	I had the 42mm Polar and flipped it for the 40mm. I don't think the 42mm is too big but I'm not a fan of the thicker hands and dial plots. The 40mm is just a bit more elegant for me. If I were to go 42mm again I would chose the black. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.

28 September 2017, 06:52 AM	#31
kangajack Banned Join Date: May 2014 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 246	216570 is my choice every day of the week. All those 40mm or nothing people are either jealous, or have a Napoleon Complex. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 September 2017, 01:17 AM	#32
toomuchtalk "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: UK Posts: 2,147	I own both. I think if I had to choose though I would go 40mm. The 5 digit cases are just a better fit to the wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 September 2017, 01:34 AM	#33
218225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Netherlands Watch: 1655+216570 Posts: 497	I love my 39mm 1655 for its elegance and comfort but prefer my 42 mm expII. The bigger dial makes it much easier too read and I love the orange hand over de 40mm red hand. And I have the size too get the proportions right. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro

29 September 2017, 01:38 AM	#34
dberman3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Doug Location: Jupiter Posts: 420	My original plan was the 16570 but ended up going with the 216570 first. So then I went to buy the 16570 last month as I have a few other 40mm models that I love and love the way they fit, but couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger. After wearing it for the past year or two, I really love the 216570. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)