The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Is the YM II a future classic
Yes 66 24.35%
No 205 75.65%
Voters: 271. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 January 2019, 10:13 AM   #31
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bxtek View Post
Could be a good investment and you could be laughing all the way to the bank in 10-20 years! One question for you though.....How do you feel about the YM II yourself? Are you a fan? Forget about price and values for a second, would you buy and wear it strictly for the style and size?

I own the one in the wrist shot above. I started the thread when I realized just how polarizing I have discovered the YM II is on TRF

As for investment, I think I'd rather buy some real estate which you can pretty much guarantee that it will increase in 10, 15, 20 years. Take the profit from that later on and buy a few Rolexes that you actually like and will enjoy! Plus, during the 10, 15, 20 years you can rent out the properties and have money returning to you. Just my 2 cents.



Exactly how I feel. I think people should buy a watch because they like it and will enjoy it, not strictly on potential investment return. If the value does increase while you own a particular watch, consider it an additional bonus!
I own the one in the wrist shot above. I started the thread when I realized just how polarizing I have discovered the YM II is on TRF
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 10:47 AM   #32
Bobby T
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
Unfortunately, a Rolex doesn't get much worse looking than a YM II
Bobby T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 11:19 AM   #33
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby T View Post
Unfortunately, a Rolex doesn't get much worse looking than a YM II
Bobby T, objectively, what don’t you like about the YM II? Also, it would be useful to get an idea which Rolex model(s) you are comparing to, when you mention aesthetics? Very interested to know. Thanks.
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 11:23 AM   #34
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Currently at 20% of our community thinks this will be a classic, any more votes?
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 11:52 AM   #35
Bxtek
"TRF" Member
 
Bxtek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 2,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
I own the one in the wrist shot above. I started the thread when I realized just how polarizing I have discovered the YM II is on TRF
Oops, I missed that somehow. Looks good on you! I haven't been following the YM II too closely and the different variations, but I've never seen that particular one before. I like that bezel much more than the blue one that I see most of the times. The red hand against that dial looks sharp! Maybe another reason why I don't care for the YM II is that it takes the right kinda person to pull off wearing one. I'm definitely not one. At 44mm, it's way too big for my wrist. I tried one on before and it looks like I'm wearing a clown watch. More power to the people who can wear one of these comfortably!
Bxtek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 12:55 PM   #36
diracpoint
2024 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Full disclosure

Looks great on you. That is the most rare version of Ym-2. I have the ss one and love it. Re future collectibility, some people (such as Tim Mosso at Watchbox, TRF mod Tools) think that YM-2 has a very high chance of being a future collectible. (Link: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=293048). However, it might take 30-40 years after it is discontinued (if at all that happens). I'm pretty sure I won't be kicking around that time to count the money :-) Just enjoying it for the moment ...



Last edited by diracpoint; 6 January 2019 at 12:58 PM.. Reason: Link added
diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 01:02 PM   #37
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bxtek View Post
Oops, I missed that somehow. Looks good on you! I haven't been following the YM II too closely and the different variations, but I've never seen that particular one before. I like that bezel much more than the blue one that I see most of the times. The red hand against that dial looks sharp! Maybe another reason why I don't care for the YM II is that it takes the right kinda person to pull off wearing one. I'm definitely not one. At 44mm, it's way too big for my wrist. I tried one on before and it looks like I'm wearing a clown watch. More power to the people who can wear one of these comfortably!
Thats bxtek, apreciate your candid comments and clarity. The watch does wear large but, no larger than say a base 44 panerai. This is all irrelevant if the wrist cannot handle the size of a watch and, I 100% agree that a too big watch looks quirky. Ive tried some of the bigger 50mm watches and they look clownish on me as you say. My panerai bronzo is 47mm yet that doesn’t look as large as it is.
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2019, 01:06 PM   #38
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by diracpoint View Post
Looks great on you. That is the most rare version of Ym-2. I have the ss one and love it. Re future collectibility, some people (such as Tim Mosso at Watchbox, TRF mod Tools) think that YM-2 has a very high chance of being a future collectible. (Link: https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=293048). However, it might take 30-40 years after it is discontinued (if at all that happens). I'm pretty sure I won't be kicking around that time to count the money :-) Just enjoying it for the moment ...


That watch looks stunning on you, congrats. As I already have the smurf sub, I didn’t want another blue bezel watch (one is enough) so I fell for the platinum bezel wg YM II. I think that variant tones down somewhat the watch and I like that.
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 05:22 AM   #39
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
A spirit clairvoyant told me that https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Wilsdorf is unhappy with this show of strength on TRF, we need more votes :)
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 07:11 AM   #40
mjr24
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 587
What more do you need to see that you didn’t already know? The YM is a nice watch but a high majority of the people don’t like it and don’t think it looks nice....hence the lower demand. It’s never going to be a classic anything.
mjr24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 07:22 AM   #41
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjr24 View Post
What more do you need to see that you didn’t already know? The YM is a nice watch but a high majority of the people don’t like it and don’t think it looks nice....hence the lower demand. It’s never going to be a classic anything.
Thanks mjr24. However, I feel a little perspective and equation is required to invalidate these views. Rolex manufacture +20 variants. If we then consider that those, say 20, be equal to 100% of the rolex aficionados offering their opinion. We can easily conclude that with +/- 20% of the current vote, the YM II is well above average in the appeal stakes.
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 07:39 AM   #42
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Thanks mjr24. However, I feel a little perspective and equation is required to invalidate these views. Rolex manufacture +20 variants. If we then consider that those, say 20, be equal to 100% of the rolex aficionados offering their opinion. We can easily conclude that with +/- 20% of the current vote, the YM II is well above average in the appeal stakes.
I have no idea what you just said.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 07:51 AM   #43
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
YM II is pretty unique and I actually like it. The major concern is obviously the price, the most expensive MSRP SS Rolex. Other than the diehard fans or riches, WIS mostly prefer other options at this price range (almost 20k when tax included for a SS watch). And historically speaking, very expensive Rolex models can hardly become collectibles, just saying, in general. Of course I am not saying YM 2 can't be an exception and becomes a hot price in the future.
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 10:12 AM   #44
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
I have no idea what you just said.
Wrote.
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2019, 10:45 AM   #45
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Wrote.
Semantics.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 04:02 PM   #46
cli575
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 87
my bet is yes. any rolex with a unique feature has a good chance to become a classic. Most of the time general public will just follow the recent trend which can't be blamed. Most of the time classic just came out of the blue or a sudden marketing gimmick. Who knows, maybe one day Brad Pitt wears one to the supermarket and someone posted on IG and boom!
cli575 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 10:24 PM   #47
RolexFan007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: US and AU
Watch: YM2 116680
Posts: 545
Very nice watch overall...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20190115_164948_crop_569x593.jpg (263.4 KB, 89 views)
RolexFan007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2019, 11:59 PM   #48
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
I don't know whether or not it will become a future collectible. I do know I have no use for it now, and can't foresee having a need for it at a later time.


This
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:06 AM   #49
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
I don't know whether or not it will become a future collectible. I do know I have no use for it now, and can't foresee having a need for it at a later time.


I honestly don’t see why not. Of course if you polled a Paul Newman back before it was called a Paul Newman it would receive 90% No in your poll. I am not sure yacht master will ever reach the popularity as a Daytona. I think after it is no longer in production (if the day ever comes), it is obviously produced less, it is unpopular and thus may be hard to obtain down the road. So the supply side of the supply demand chart will be there. It is hard to see demand picking up, but if it does, absolutely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 12:17 AM   #50
1watch
"TRF" Member
 
1watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
I highly doubt it will be considered a collectible in the future


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 03:39 AM   #51
timedate
-
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 1,001
it is the worst looking watch i have ever seen.

cant see it becoming a classic.
timedate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 06:29 AM   #52
R!$
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
daytona prices are falling and sub prices are back to normal

the correction is taking place
R!$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 07:41 AM   #53
1watch
"TRF" Member
 
1watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by R!$ View Post
daytona prices are falling and sub prices are back to normal



the correction is taking place


Which references are you referring to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 08:36 AM   #54
PatronMTL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
Food for thought on Rolex as an investment

Not sure of prices back then but just say for arguments sake

ExpII assume $1500 back in 1977. invest in DowJones when it was 831 points back in 1977 to today 23000 at 2018 would net you $41k (which is more than the $29k)

Coke assume $2000 back in 1987. invest in DowJones at 1938 points would yield you $24k (which is more than the $19k)
you forget the implied value of use..... you can wear a watch at the same time as it gains value....cant wear the DOW

but ya, money wise markets will always be better until the end of capitalism (or the world as we know it)
PatronMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2019, 08:40 AM   #55
PatronMTL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
Currently at 20% of our community thinks this will be a classic, any more votes?
im pretty sure all the yes votes are from YMII owners...

for this same reason, i voted yes lol

what i always wondered was what was what had more influence on the main reason for the low sales/ the fact that you can always find one at retail whne all SS are sold out:

-the look of the YMII
or
-the fact it costs double the price of a sub or gmt
PatronMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2019, 06:20 PM   #56
cli575
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by R!$ View Post
daytona prices are falling and sub prices are back to normal

the correction is taking place
seriously?
cli575 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2019, 05:05 AM   #57
inadeje
2024 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
I don’t think the zenith Daytona was languishing at ADs that was the 4 digits.
It was. They didn’t sell, as was the case with the Paul Newman
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2019, 07:00 AM   #58
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
No one knows for sure but it's a beautiful reference. I've seen plenty of Rolexes that look amazing in photos but comes nowhere close in person. The YM2 was the opposite of that for me, it looked ok in photos but it was striking in person.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.