ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 October 2016, 08:29 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Singapore
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 1,689
|
|
5 October 2016, 10:31 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,446
|
Don't judge the nautilus by its 40th anniversary piece collection. It's terrible. now compare a standard ss 5711 or 5712 to a 41 or thin 39 and you have a great comparo.
|
9 October 2016, 04:57 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
The standard Nautilus range isn't too good either. The hands are a different design to the indices unlike the AP 15202 where everything matches.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.