ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 July 2014, 02:11 PM | #31 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,978
|
Quote:
I can support almost anything with my 7.25-7.5 flat wrist but I no longer wish to push the limits. It looks out of proportion and is uncomfortable FOR ME. No offense to those who like the look. Yes there are plenty of cool watches 40mm and under but there are just so many awesome pieces I wish were 40mm instead of 44mm. AP 44 RG topping the list. |
|
9 July 2014, 12:49 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New York City
Watch: 116613lb
Posts: 15
|
Thanks guys, sound like most people think it is too big.
But i will still check out local AP boutique when i have a chance to see how it actually fits/looks on my wrist. Who knows right :D |
9 July 2014, 02:46 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I have a 6.5 inch flat wrist and I feel the Diver barely fits me. These are being worn loose. I'm tempted to add a diver myself.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
9 July 2014, 04:53 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Philippines
Watch: AP ROC 26320 Black
Posts: 280
|
i think u should try it on your wrist bec I have a 6.5inch wrist and the diver looked perfectly fine.
with regards to the strap, i was told you can order the XS strap to fit it perfectly. |
9 July 2014, 08:49 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ...
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
I personally think your ref.5711 fits quite nicely... |
|
9 July 2014, 08:59 AM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,506
|
6.5 inch wrist and it feels perfect for my wrist. Then again, I am use to wearing 44mm Panerai's so its all relative in my eyes!
|
9 July 2014, 09:06 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
The watch definitely wears big...I'm ok with that on this particular piece though, haha. Too each their own I suppose
|
9 July 2014, 09:51 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 568
|
Yes it will be too big. The rubber will be jotting outwards.
I too have a 6" wrist. Gave up in the end and sold my fc diver. Now spotting the 37mm ro |
9 July 2014, 03:39 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
|
10 July 2014, 01:26 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
|
Yes. Way too big IMO. My wrist is close to 7 inch and I cannot pull it off. Too big for me and I don't mind bigger watches.
__________________
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive. " |
10 July 2014, 09:36 AM | #41 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,506
|
Buddy Chris.. I think you will like it a lot. We have a lot of the same pieces and I prefer the diver over the blnr any day of the week. And I think it will be a nice piece to your super collection... I was also thinking about the PP.. but I need to sell a few pieces first haha!!
|
10 July 2014, 03:36 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
Quote:
I have actually traded most of my collection away to make room for my Patek. I still currently have a 15300 but feel it's a tad redundant now with the 5711. Hence my interest in the diver. I would be trading my 15300 if I were going to pick one up.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
|
11 July 2014, 02:11 AM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,506
|
and I love your PP.. I would strongly consider selling a few pieces to trade into that grail.. but these 40mm classic sized Subs/GMTs/SDs are so hard to give up (for me at least..) given the classic feel. Still, I hear you on the redundant part.
|
11 July 2014, 07:40 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
So what watches are you left with now? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
11 July 2014, 09:34 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
Quote:
5711 blue, 15300 silver/white, 114060, Daytona white dial. Thinking of swapping the 15300 for a diver and adding a Panerai and Pepsi.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
|
11 July 2014, 04:57 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Diego
Location: Mexico
Watch: PP,AL&S,AP,Rolex
Posts: 825
|
AP ROO are supposed to be big sporty watches. Not like the more traditional RO line which is more dressy. Take this into account. If you want a watch on the big side this is it. Good luck!
|
11 July 2014, 05:03 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Diego
Location: Mexico
Watch: PP,AL&S,AP,Rolex
Posts: 825
|
|
11 July 2014, 06:07 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Watch: AP, RM
Posts: 605
|
a forged carbon diver b/c its black would wear alot smaller than a SS diver
|
11 July 2014, 08:21 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Yeah try the black divers instead.
The steel diver is a big watch.
__________________
newb watch collector |
11 July 2014, 09:51 PM | #50 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,299
|
I would, 5711 and Diver make a great duo.
|
12 July 2014, 06:51 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
|
13 July 2014, 07:09 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
|
2 July 2017, 07:50 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
http://m.imgur.com/a/CPZQF
http://m.imgur.com/BdoAR04?r Some photos from a local AD. What do you think? Too big? Should add that I like wearing large watches (have a PAM112 and PAM372) |
2 July 2017, 08:12 AM | #54 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,299
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2 July 2017, 09:43 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
|
Whether a watch is too big depends on several factors. If you search on Youtube the popular watch channels will explain it to you. Among them, 2 are wrist size/shape and also the type of watch. Some watches are meant to wear small, some big. Dress watches small, dive watches like the ROO, Panerais, Breitlings also wear big. By wear big, it means they look good looking chunky and tough. I wouldn't be wrong to assume watch makers do their statistics, hence dress watches go 36mm to 41mm-ish and dive watches go 41-ish to whatever...
Still I would think a 6 inch wrist has to be really flat to wear the diver. I think the diver looks right on mine at 6.3 inch and a flat wrist which is almost all bone. I'm a lean to muscular sort of built. I've got large elbows also (haha) so that makes my forearm look less petite. Conversly, if one's wrist is too big the diver starts looking like it has Patek dimensions then you're better off getting 44mm ROOs or 47mm PAMs and so on. For reference I wear the rubber strap on smallest hole and the bracelet with one link. The bracelet hugs the wrist much better and shrinks the overall look making it slip under easily under my cuffs. Frontal shot of whole arm for proportion (and also testing Imgur for 1st time after Photobucket kicked the bucket for me): PS : someone from Imgu asked why my arm was red and hand white. I am just recovering from rashes on my arm :-) It's not the watch restricting blood to my hands haha |
2 July 2017, 04:33 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
It depends on your wrist shape and overall physique.
Mine measures 6.25 inches and is quite flat. I wear a 44 ROO and this does not look big on my wrist. Probably helps my body size is big. |
2 July 2017, 08:03 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Tokyo
Watch: PP-VC-AP
Posts: 1,003
|
I would probably say too big as well. I have tried the diver on a few times but felt that it was too big on my 6.7 inch wrist. My wrist is also very flat but I didn't think I could pull it off. Not only is it wide but it is also tall and a very heavy watch. I ended up going with the no-date ceramic sub instead.
__________________
|
2 July 2017, 10:25 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Finland
Posts: 598
|
It will be too large. Try regular RO preferably 15300 or 15202.
|
2 July 2017, 10:30 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Finland
Posts: 598
|
|
2 July 2017, 10:36 PM | #60 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,159
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.