The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 February 2019, 01:02 AM   #1
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Starting over - 5513 vs 14060M

Hey everyone!

So, I'll keep this short, but I'm looking to start over. I currently have an engraved 114270 (purchased after never bonding to the 241270, too disproportionate) that I'm most likely going to off soon. My first Rolex was a 14060, I loved it, but ultimately sold it to fund an engagement ring. I planned to replace it but come wedding time, the explorer is what fit my budget. My wife was fond of the 214270 so I told myself it would be right, but the explorer I and I have just been fighting (both 39 and 36). I constantly find myself wanting that classic sub, so after much thought, I'm going to restart with a sub. I admire the explorer, but I want to add it to the collection later, when I truly WANT the explorer.

Quite honestly it does the whole "one watch" or "only watch" thing better than the sub, but alas, I need to follow through with the sub, I always look down and think "what if I had my sub back".

THAT SAID. I'm debating a freshened up 5513 service dial or a 14060M 4 line. The goal for the watch is to be a do it all for awhile. I want it to be the foundation of the collection. Go on vacations, hike, bike, surf, snowboard, camp. I want to be active with it and make memories (hence no original matte 5513's, don't want to ruin an original dial).

Which route would you go? I've somewhat considered a 114060 since their prices used are relatively close to a 4 liner 14060. But having lug holes is attractive for throwing on natos during outdoor activities.

Thanks guys! oh and happy valentines day
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:06 AM   #2
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
As a one-and-only watch, the 14060M gets my vote. It's easier to bang around and replace parts without concern and less of a concern with water resistance.

Good luck in whichever direction you go.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:08 AM   #3
Kyle3130
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
14060M FTW! The prices of the 5513s are double what the 14060Ms are right now. The classic Submariner with a modern movement IMHO is the best bang for your buck in watches right now. Happy hunting!
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:16 AM   #4
nigelUK
"TRF" Member
 
nigelUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,058
What about a SS Sea Dweller ? Bang for your buck ! tough as nails, go anywhere.


Probably similar price to a 14060 . . . just a thought
__________________
insta : NigelUK
nigelUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:32 AM   #5
nabbasi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: TN
Posts: 9
That’s tough, but I’d vote 14060M solely because if it’s something to wear daily, I think I’d go with newer.
nabbasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:34 AM   #6
Brian Page
"TRF" Member
 
Brian Page's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,615
14060M for sure for all the reasons already pointed out.
Brian Page is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:39 AM   #7
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
I love plexiglass SS Sports Rolex watches. However, if it is going to be my one and only to use in the water on a regular basis, it is going to be a Rolex with a sapphire crystal primarily due to the mechanism by which the crystal affixes to the midcase.

See my thread from years past when I used to take my Plexiglass Rolex watches diving.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=287895
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:45 AM   #8
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
I love plexiglass SS Sports Rolex watches. However, if it is going to be my one and only to use in the water on a regular basis, it is going to be a Rolex with a sapphire crystal primarily due to the mechanism by which the crystal affixes to the midcase.

See my thread from years past when I used to take my Plexiglass Rolex watches diving.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=287895
Ah great point, I did forget about the advancements in water proofing that come with the sapphire models. I figured since I don't dive (though would like to try) the water proofing didn't need to be too extreme. Though waves can certainly generate a lot pressure...
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:46 AM   #9
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
As a one-and-only watch, the 14060M gets my vote. It's easier to bang around and replace parts without concern and less of a concern with water resistance.

Good luck in whichever direction you go.
I definitely didn't consider the ease of parts replacements. I guess I figured a service dial 5513 would have decent parts availability as well. If memory serves right 5513's use 316 steel and 14060 uses 914 correct? Probably something else to take into serious consideration!
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:49 AM   #10
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by nigelUK View Post
What about a SS Sea Dweller ? Bang for your buck ! tough as nails, go anywhere.


Probably similar price to a 14060 . . . just a thought
Hmm you're right, I guess I failed to review 16600 prices lately. I've never handled one in the flesh though, always enjoyed the balance/flatness of the 14060. However, the SD being MUCH less common is certainly appealing. Might be worth buying one for a test drive! The pains of being a lover of 4/5 digit models!
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:59 AM   #11
Armyguy03
"TRF" Member
 
Armyguy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
If all were equal (cost wise, I'm not sure as I don't track the grey market), I'd acquire the 16600. I have personally seen only 2 in the wild over my years of ownership. However, surprisingly, I have only seen 1 14060 in the wild.

In all, you'll be happy with either acquisition as long as you wear it on a NATO, and it has lug holes.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Armyguy03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 02:02 AM   #12
Fawkesguy
"TRF" Member
 
Fawkesguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NJ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 16
14060M, all the way. You could begin and end with that one model.
Fawkesguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 02:06 AM   #13
Dpop24
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: California
Posts: 348
I vote 16600 if that's now on the table.
Dpop24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 02:21 AM   #14
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,597
14060M gets my vote
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 02:59 AM   #15
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,650
I like the 5513 better but long term if you want one watch, 14060 is the right play.
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:13 AM   #16
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,416
As others have said it's about what you really want. 14060M is all the modern improvements (most of them anyway) in a classic case and bracelet. 5513 is cool for vintage-y reasons. That plexi is an issue. And just the age. I know there are plenty out there that are daily wearers though. A nice example is starting to get pretty pricey though. For that matter so are 14060M's
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:21 AM   #17
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,432
14060M 16600 are both great choices.
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:29 AM   #18
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Interesting.

Ive been considering a 214270 in place of my 14060M.

I’ve got a ton of divers (Omega, MKII, etc..) and really like the mk2 dial.
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:36 AM   #19
Rocketman39
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: 5513,Hulk,GMTII
Posts: 364
Having owned a 5513 for over 50 Years, Memories can not be replaced! The technical advances Rolex has made over time can not be overstated. Look Hard at the choices and One will reach out and grab you. When it does, "Just Do It"
Rocketman39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:44 AM   #20
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
14060 would be my route.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:53 AM   #21
MJZRolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 683
The 14060M gets my vote. A classic Sub that you’ll be happy with for years to come. You can add to your collection later.
MJZRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 03:55 AM   #22
ccaballero
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: None
Posts: 646
14060m random serial. If u can find in good condition, these are reasonably priced these days.
ccaballero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 04:11 AM   #23
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,459
Either choice is a great one..

I might lean towards the 14060M since it would have a newer and tighter bracelet and quicker beat movement.

Still, they don't make classic plexi watches any more.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 04:22 AM   #24
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
14060M, no question about it if it is going to be your GADA watch for a while.

The 4 liners are rare but consider also the 2 liner fat four bezel as an option. 14060M are the last true tool watches, holes case, no SEL, serene dial without date, squicky bracelet, built to last. What's not to love?



Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 06:32 AM   #25
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,434
If 5513, go all the way for originality. Otherwise the 14060 will serve you for a lifetime.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 08:48 AM   #26
stevedssd
"TRF" Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
I’m going against the majority with 5513. The late original glossy dial ones don’t cost much more than a 14060 and are a great middle ground between vintage and modern
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 3BA93AB9-5133-4016-BB8F-D4E15C609AE5.jpeg (58.1 KB, 1007 views)
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 08:51 AM   #27
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
As a one-and-only watch, the 14060M gets my vote. It's easier to bang around and replace parts without concern and less of a concern with water resistance.

Good luck in whichever direction you go.
agree with this. peace of mind wearing it as a daily wear is the winner for me if it is a one and done collection.

i cant image a better choice.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 10:32 AM   #28
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,750
I have owned both, and only kept the 5513. It's got an RSC dial and hands (appropriate style for this L serial anyway), with new crystal and pressure tested, so is fine as a daily and can go in the water to some depth. The 14060m just looked and felt a bit flat in comparison.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5513 wrist.jpg (192.1 KB, 971 views)
File Type: jpg 5513.JPG (171.5 KB, 970 views)
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:53 PM   #29
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armyguy03 View Post
If all were equal (cost wise, I'm not sure as I don't track the grey market), I'd acquire the 16600. I have personally seen only 2 in the wild over my years of ownership. However, surprisingly, I have only seen 1 14060 in the wild.

In all, you'll be happy with either acquisition as long as you wear it on a NATO, and it has lug holes.


Hey man long time no talk! You may not remember but you sold me my first Rolex! I bought the Y serial 14060 from you a few years back! Lol
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2019, 01:55 PM   #30
Aututto
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedssd View Post
I’m going against the majority with 5513. The late original glossy dial ones don’t cost much more than a 14060 and are a great middle ground between vintage and modern


Wow looks great! Any issues with waterproofing? To my understanding the plexi’s can get the rusty ring as sort of an indicator they water resistance is weakening. But that could be the top hat plexis not sure
Aututto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.