ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sefit · 21 June 2010, 07:04 AM

Hi guys,

My first post and it will be a bit strange...sorry

I was "observing" various treads for many days here with the intention to pull trigger and buy my first Rolex. Many of you had been my mentors without knowing about it. Thanks a lot.

After some time I have strongly decided to go with ss sub date like timeless classics which really catch my eye. Unfortunately I have found out from you (dark side of your expertise lol) that 16610 will be soon replaced by new 116610 with brand new features but I was still tending to 16610 look. I was trying to find 16610 version to see it in real but I wasn't successful nor in Luxemburg neither in Brussels (June 2010). Rolex would have been gift for my 30th birthday but all ADs across whole Benelux had been telling me that it s too late, all 16610 are sold out and I have to wait for 116610 if I want sub date. Somehow I persuaded myself that new sub date is better because it s brand new and all of these feature there.... suddenly a day of my 30th birthday one AD from Brussels called me whether I am still looking for 16610 because he has got one. I rushed to the retailer store to see it in person and I was stunned. I have asked AD whether I can compared it to new 116610 model, which, of course, wasn't possible but he had 116618LN and 116619 LB to make some comparisons. First thing that wasn't even mention here is the weight. I don't know exact figures but I can estimate that new sub date are some 1/3 heavier than still contemporary version. Moreover they are more sporty (supercase, beefier lugs and hands) and maybe I wasn't paying enough attention but even cerachrom bezel wasn't such an alluring issue. I am not diver at all. I am working as a diplomat, wearing a suits all days and some casual decent dress during weekends. My wrist is 7 inches (quite girly but true

)....so to wrap it up somehow I have bought one of the last available 16610. I love the watch very much but "bug in my head" is back. Did I do right when I have taken 16610 over 116610

? I only want to hear your opinions, because you and only YOU can understand me.

GeeRam · 21 June 2010, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sefit

Did I do right when I have taken 16610 over 116610

?

Yes

nauticajoe · 21 June 2010, 07:10 AM

Congrats on your 1st Rolex. By joining this forum, I'm sure it won't be your last either.
The Sub is an icon, a classic.

Congrats on your acquisition.

Can't wait to see pics.

bmsermd · 21 June 2010, 07:11 AM

2nd the motion.
You did well with your decision.
Congrats!

bmsermd · 21 June 2010, 07:12 AM

Damn, Joe beat me.
3rd, I guess.

Johny · 21 June 2010, 07:12 AM

YES and you can always buy the ceramic one and then you will have two. win win. j

sleddog · 21 June 2010, 07:18 AM

You made the right choice.........If when the new one comes out and you like it,trade up!!
One thing to mention though is the weight comment....The 2 models you were refering to were solid gold models!! These will certainly be heavier than the SS....
As for the 16610 and the new 116610 I would say the weight will be very close,within 15gr or so...

johnny80s · 21 June 2010, 07:20 AM

The current sub 16610 is a true classic IMHO

nauticajoe · 21 June 2010, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmsermd

Damn, Joe beat me.
3rd, I guess.

Sorry Brant.

Macro80 · 21 June 2010, 07:25 AM

Absolutely made the right decision! Congratulations!!

learningtofly · 21 June 2010, 07:49 AM

yes! The 16610 is an icon, and always will be. There'll be plenty of time to buy a 116610 if that's what you want to do in the future.

PS Us 16610 owners know it's MUCH more beautiful anyway

Nicko · 21 June 2010, 07:55 AM

Get the 16610, the new ones have not retained the classic look of the Submariner IMO.

Johny · 21 June 2010, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by learningtofly

yes! The 16610 is an icon, and always will be. There'll be plenty of time to buy a 116610 if that's what you want to do in the future.

PS Us 16610 owners know it's MUCH more beautiful anyway

this is true...you are now one of the happy people.

Green Arrow · 21 June 2010, 08:18 AM

Ultimately the watch that makes YOU happy is the right decision. Plus, you can always change your mind later and buy the ceramic, either as a replacement, or to start a collection. Congratulations!

gregmoeck · 21 June 2010, 09:21 AM

I just bought one as well. I wanted the classic before they were gone. I dont care too much about the new features, the classic sub is a really flexible watch and looks great without screaming look at me... no one really ever notices it and after about a month it disapears from your wrist, you cant feel it, its perfectly balanced.

els4 · 21 June 2010, 10:54 AM

Absolutely the right choice. The 16610 is a classic, but I'm not so sure the new one will ever be a classic. IMHO it is an ugly watch. I agree with Parasentesis that Rolex dropped the ball on the new Sub.

mfer · 21 June 2010, 11:59 AM

You did well!

htc8p · 21 June 2010, 12:16 PM

price will help you decide. the subc seems to be overpriced when newly released

ParisDakarBmw · 21 June 2010, 01:34 PM

You did just fine. The name is the same, but the new Sub has some different features. Basically it's a different watch all together.

zenjoy your new watch, but know that the new model will be there for years to come. You can get one if you ever wanted one.

SSD · 21 June 2010, 01:37 PM

Good choice!

sakuraba · 22 June 2010, 12:06 AM

Congratulations!

FWIW I've never regretted a Rolex purchase. Wear it, enjoy it, and then trade it when you feel like you want something else. They keep their values very well.

DSJ · 22 June 2010, 01:08 AM

You made a great decision, IMO.

Welcome to TRF!

sefit · 22 June 2010, 07:02 AM

Gentlemen,

thank you very much for warm welcome to TRF and of course for your opinions that made me extremely happy

. As a laic in this area and I was very curious to hear some expert's statements to my issue. I was expecting some discussion and polemic but I have got unanimity nod for my purchase. I will have definitely pleasure to wear my 16610

. Pics will follow as soon as I charge camera lithium battery which I have found out to be dry

Watch Fan · 22 June 2010, 01:54 PM

Absolutely! Good choise. I'm sure the new one will be nice but...........there are definately things I still like better about the older model. The 16610 case is nicer in my opinion. The new lugs take some getting used to. Also the weight is heavier on the new one. Ceramic bezel is nice and all, but wait till you put a chip in it. Unlike the bezel on your 16610, the ceramic bezel would cost an arm and a leg to replace. Don't think ceramic doesn't chip, believe me, it does!

wjrw592 · 22 June 2010, 02:39 PM

I would say great choice, especially to have it to wear now vs later! I am fairly new to
TRF as well and Rolex as my first acquisition was a 16610 last month. Congrats!!

Johny · 22 June 2010, 09:51 PM

how are you enjoying it so far. have you almost crashed your car yet.

Johny · 22 June 2010, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wjrw592

I would say great choice, especially to have it to wear now vs later! I am fairly new to
TRF as well and Rolex as my first acquisition was a 16610 last month. Congrats!!

happy new watch.

21 June 2010, 07:04 AM	#1
sefit Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Belgium-temporary Watch: 16610&116610LN Posts: 37	confession - sub date 16610 Hi guys, My first post and it will be a bit strange...sorry I was "observing" various treads for many days here with the intention to pull trigger and buy my first Rolex. Many of you had been my mentors without knowing about it. Thanks a lot. After some time I have strongly decided to go with ss sub date like timeless classics which really catch my eye. Unfortunately I have found out from you (dark side of your expertise lol) that 16610 will be soon replaced by new 116610 with brand new features but I was still tending to 16610 look. I was trying to find 16610 version to see it in real but I wasn't successful nor in Luxemburg neither in Brussels (June 2010). Rolex would have been gift for my 30th birthday but all ADs across whole Benelux had been telling me that it s too late, all 16610 are sold out and I have to wait for 116610 if I want sub date. Somehow I persuaded myself that new sub date is better because it s brand new and all of these feature there.... suddenly a day of my 30th birthday one AD from Brussels called me whether I am still looking for 16610 because he has got one. I rushed to the retailer store to see it in person and I was stunned. I have asked AD whether I can compared it to new 116610 model, which, of course, wasn't possible but he had 116618LN and 116619 LB to make some comparisons. First thing that wasn't even mention here is the weight. I don't know exact figures but I can estimate that new sub date are some 1/3 heavier than still contemporary version. Moreover they are more sporty (supercase, beefier lugs and hands) and maybe I wasn't paying enough attention but even cerachrom bezel wasn't such an alluring issue. I am not diver at all. I am working as a diplomat, wearing a suits all days and some casual decent dress during weekends. My wrist is 7 inches (quite girly but true )....so to wrap it up somehow I have bought one of the last available 16610. I love the watch very much but "bug in my head" is back. Did I do right when I have taken 16610 over 116610? I only want to hear your opinions, because you and only YOU can understand me.

21 June 2010, 07:18 AM	#7
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,907	You made the right choice.........If when the new one comes out and you like it,trade up!! One thing to mention though is the weight comment....The 2 models you were refering to were solid gold models!! These will certainly be heavier than the SS.... As for the 16610 and the new 116610 I would say the weight will be very close,within 15gr or so... __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

21 June 2010, 11:59 AM	#17
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,723	You did well! __________________ member#3242

21 June 2010, 01:37 PM	#20
SSD "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jamie Location: Georgia Watch: Stainless Sub Date Posts: 3,023	Good choice! __________________ SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464

22 June 2010, 12:06 AM	#21
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	Congratulations! FWIW I've never regretted a Rolex purchase. Wear it, enjoy it, and then trade it when you feel like you want something else. They keep their values very well. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

21 June 2010, 07:10 AM	#3
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Congrats on your 1st Rolex. By joining this forum, I'm sure it won't be your last either. The Sub is an icon, a classic. Congrats on your acquisition. Can't wait to see pics.

21 June 2010, 07:11 AM	#4
bmsermd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Brant Location: YYZ Watch: 16610 LV (V......) Posts: 101	2nd the motion. You did well with your decision. Congrats!

21 June 2010, 07:12 AM	#5
bmsermd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Brant Location: YYZ Watch: 16610 LV (V......) Posts: 101	Damn, Joe beat me. 3rd, I guess.

21 June 2010, 07:12 AM	#6
Johny "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: john Location: Scotland Watch: sub 16610Lv Posts: 13,523	YES and you can always buy the ceramic one and then you will have two. win win. j

21 June 2010, 07:20 AM	#8
johnny80s "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: John Location: Chicago Posts: 499	The current sub 16610 is a true classic IMHO

21 June 2010, 07:25 AM	#10
Macro80 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: London Posts: 248	Absolutely made the right decision! Congratulations!!

21 June 2010, 07:49 AM	#11
learningtofly 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Tony Location: London, England Watch: Hmmm... Posts: 2,479	yes! The 16610 is an icon, and always will be. There'll be plenty of time to buy a 116610 if that's what you want to do in the future. PS Us 16610 owners know it's MUCH more beautiful anyway

21 June 2010, 07:55 AM	#12
Nicko Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Not here anymore Posts: 4,787	Get the 16610, the new ones have not retained the classic look of the Submariner IMO.

21 June 2010, 08:18 AM	#14
Green Arrow "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: USA Posts: 1,060	Ultimately the watch that makes YOU happy is the right decision. Plus, you can always change your mind later and buy the ceramic, either as a replacement, or to start a collection. Congratulations!

21 June 2010, 09:21 AM	#15
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	I just bought one as well. I wanted the classic before they were gone. I dont care too much about the new features, the classic sub is a really flexible watch and looks great without screaming look at me... no one really ever notices it and after about a month it disapears from your wrist, you cant feel it, its perfectly balanced.

21 June 2010, 10:54 AM	#16
els4 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Edgars Location: Southeastern PA Watch: Wimbledon DJ Posts: 201	Absolutely the right choice. The 16610 is a classic, but I'm not so sure the new one will ever be a classic. IMHO it is an ugly watch. I agree with Parasentesis that Rolex dropped the ball on the new Sub.

21 June 2010, 12:16 PM	#18
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,450	price will help you decide. the subc seems to be overpriced when newly released

21 June 2010, 01:34 PM	#19
ParisDakarBmw Banned Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: New Haven, CT Watch: 116610 Sub-C Posts: 6,552	You did just fine. The name is the same, but the new Sub has some different features. Basically it's a different watch all together. zenjoy your new watch, but know that the new model will be there for years to come. You can get one if you ever wanted one.

22 June 2010, 01:08 AM	#22
DSJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: USA Watch: your step! Posts: 7,882	You made a great decision, IMO. Welcome to TRF! __________________ Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP

22 June 2010, 07:02 AM	#23
sefit Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Belgium-temporary Watch: 16610&116610LN Posts: 37	Gentlemen, thank you very much for warm welcome to TRF and of course for your opinions that made me extremely happy. As a laic in this area and I was very curious to hear some expert's statements to my issue. I was expecting some discussion and polemic but I have got unanimity nod for my purchase. I will have definitely pleasure to wear my 16610. Pics will follow as soon as I charge camera lithium battery which I have found out to be dry

22 June 2010, 01:54 PM	#24
Watch Fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: California Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 676	Absolutely! Good choise. I'm sure the new one will be nice but...........there are definately things I still like better about the older model. The 16610 case is nicer in my opinion. The new lugs take some getting used to. Also the weight is heavier on the new one. Ceramic bezel is nice and all, but wait till you put a chip in it. Unlike the bezel on your 16610, the ceramic bezel would cost an arm and a leg to replace. Don't think ceramic doesn't chip, believe me, it does!

22 June 2010, 02:39 PM	#25
wjrw592 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: PA/NJ - USA Watch: What time is it? Posts: 171	I would say great choice, especially to have it to wear now vs later! I am fairly new to TRF as well and Rolex as my first acquisition was a 16610 last month. Congrats!!

22 June 2010, 09:51 PM	#26
Johny "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: john Location: Scotland Watch: sub 16610Lv Posts: 13,523	how are you enjoying it so far. have you almost crashed your car yet.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)