ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

timnik · 7 August 2013, 09:44 PM

I've got my dads old 67 GMT Master on a 93150 sub bracelet with submariner clasp. My dad owned this watch previously and wore it on a USA Jubilee bracelet which turned out to be the wrong size, 19mm not 20mm. I like the sub clasp and I think the bracelet and clasp look good on this watch. Is it a suitable substitution?

JustinK · 7 August 2013, 10:05 PM

I also wear my GMT on a 93150. From what I have read on this forum some GMTs came on 93150 bracelets so I would say its acceptable.
Post some pictures I you get a chance.

timnik · 7 August 2013, 10:18 PM

I would but..... I don't know how to.... Yes yes I know this is the 21st century and all that!! Perhaps some kind person could run the procedure nice and slowly by me

pdoukas · 7 August 2013, 11:27 PM

I wear a 93150 with my 68 1675. I found it more comfortable on the underside of my wrist as the clasp was more centered and longer than the traditional 7836.

scottb2 · 8 August 2013, 12:29 AM

93150 is the way to fly IMHO

Tools · 8 August 2013, 01:24 AM

The GMT was offered with the 93150 bracelet for most of it's life.. perhaps so it could be worn over a flight suit..

It is definitely a suitable bracelet for this very versatile watch..

Here is one of mine that came from Rolex with a 93150 original..

joe100 · 8 August 2013, 01:35 AM

Divers extension works for flight suits as well

Hooguru · 8 August 2013, 02:30 AM

Another

for the 93150 on the 1675!

azguy · 8 August 2013, 04:35 AM

Nothing wrong at all with that...

cop414 · 8 August 2013, 04:40 AM

I think that it would be fine.

Jim M · 8 August 2013, 05:33 AM

I went that route, it is fine!

Vincent65 · 8 August 2013, 06:47 AM

Yup!

bde · 8 August 2013, 07:57 AM

Totally fine.

7 August 2013, 09:44 PM	#1
timnik "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Cambridge UK Posts: 120	GMT on a 93150 bracelet, good look? I've got my dads old 67 GMT Master on a 93150 sub bracelet with submariner clasp. My dad owned this watch previously and wore it on a USA Jubilee bracelet which turned out to be the wrong size, 19mm not 20mm. I like the sub clasp and I think the bracelet and clasp look good on this watch. Is it a suitable substitution?

8 August 2013, 01:24 AM	#6
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,260	The GMT was offered with the 93150 bracelet for most of it's life.. perhaps so it could be worn over a flight suit.. It is definitely a suitable bracelet for this very versatile watch.. Here is one of mine that came from Rolex with a 93150 original.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

8 August 2013, 01:35 AM	#7
joe100 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,753	Divers extension works for flight suits as well __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

8 August 2013, 04:40 AM	#10
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 71,872	I think that it would be fine. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

7 August 2013, 10:05 PM	#2
JustinK 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Justin Location: Jupiter, FL Watch: 1530,1665,1680 Posts: 2,055	I also wear my GMT on a 93150. From what I have read on this forum some GMTs came on 93150 bracelets so I would say its acceptable. Post some pictures I you get a chance.

7 August 2013, 10:18 PM	#3
timnik "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Cambridge UK Posts: 120	I would but..... I don't know how to.... Yes yes I know this is the 21st century and all that!! Perhaps some kind person could run the procedure nice and slowly by me

7 August 2013, 11:27 PM	#4
pdoukas "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Pete Location: Arizona Watch: ing Duke bball Posts: 1,488	I wear a 93150 with my 68 1675. I found it more comfortable on the underside of my wrist as the clasp was more centered and longer than the traditional 7836.

8 August 2013, 12:29 AM	#5
scottb2 Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: USA Posts: 651	93150 is the way to fly IMHO

8 August 2013, 02:30 AM	#8
Hooguru "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: VA Watch: 1675 Posts: 62	Another for the 93150 on the 1675!

8 August 2013, 04:35 AM	#9
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	Nothing wrong at all with that...

8 August 2013, 05:33 AM	#11
Jim M "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Long Island NY US Watch: 1675 14060M 16622 Posts: 506	I went that route, it is fine!

8 August 2013, 06:47 AM	#12
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,297	Yup!

8 August 2013, 07:57 AM	#13
bde "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Brad Location: Indiana Watch: -aholics anonymous Posts: 1,589	Totally fine.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)