ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 December 2013, 01:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: TT GMTIIc V Series
Posts: 222
|
PAM 111 / 510 or 392 ? ? ?
Hello fellow Pam comrades,
I've been lurking on this forum for quite some time now trying to decide which Pam should be my first .... I own a Rolex bi metal gmtii c and am now looking to purchase my first Pam ... I like the 111 510 and 392 ... Any advice / recommendation on which would be a good buy? I plan to purchase from one of the TRF trusted sellers.... The Larger 1950's case (312) and 47mm's are too big on my puney 6.5' wrist Many thanks all ... |
10 December 2013, 01:36 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,677
|
of those, i would lean towards the 111.
the 392, while narrower by 2 mm, is just as thick as the 312, so you probably will have the same size issue. as for the 510, the new 8-day movement seems very impressive on paper, but, it's not time-tested and i'm not convinced by the "8 DAYS" text on the dial (though i do like the balance of the four lines). the 111 is a classic first PAM. buy it used from a good seller and you will not lose any money if you decide panerai isn't for you. the top grade ETA movement is durable, reliable and cheap to service if you don't mind having it not serviced by OP. and, if you decide panerai is for you, you'll have an awesome watch from which to build your collection. good luck with the hunt! |
10 December 2013, 01:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jay
Location: Canada
Watch: 116520/PAM/PO2500
Posts: 293
|
I agree with Cru, the 111 is classic and can be had at good price. The 510 replaces the 111, but as a new piece will be at a premium; prices will come down on it as more come onto the market.
__________________
116520 - 16570 - 16610LV - 16710pepsi - 116234 |
10 December 2013, 01:57 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SoCal
Watch: TV
Posts: 108
|
Wait for the price drop of the 510 if ur not in a hurry or get the 111 now!
__________________
Rolex | Tudor | Zenith | Breitling | Seiko | Glycine | Zodiac | Bulova | Pierre Chevelle | Enicar | CYMA |
10 December 2013, 02:01 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,876
|
111 was my first
|
10 December 2013, 03:00 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
111 for me
|
10 December 2013, 06:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
111. 6497's are tanks, Panerai in-house aren't.
Most will disagree with my reasoning, but it is my reasoning.... When I think of Panerai, I think of tanks, not delicate machines.
__________________
member#3242 |
10 December 2013, 06:55 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10 December 2013, 08:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: TT GMTIIc V Series
Posts: 222
|
Thank you soo much for the great advice ...think I will go with the 111 (-:
I'll let you know once acquired ... Regards |
10 December 2013, 09:43 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,250
|
I have the same size wrist as you i have a 111 also, love it to death. Good luck with your choice
|
10 December 2013, 09:50 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,608
|
My one and only PAM is a 111 and I still really like it. I thought the Panerai thing might be a fad but it has endured.
Unless a Bronzo or Pronzo falls into my lap at MSRP it'll probably remain my only PAM. |
10 December 2013, 10:50 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Lancaster, PA
Watch: Exp II 42mm Polar
Posts: 227
|
510 all day every day. In house over ETA everytime. Ultimately is what you like the most.
|
10 December 2013, 11:02 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Good luck and here's something to further tempt you...
__________________
|
10 December 2013, 11:09 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,090
|
Quote:
111
__________________
|
|
10 December 2013, 11:19 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks
Posts: 1,170
|
I went with the 111, just last week Good luck!
|
10 December 2013, 01:56 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
10 December 2013, 02:00 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
|
10 December 2013, 03:03 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Brad
Location: Indiana
Watch: -aholics anonymous
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
I agree with your reasoning! OP, go for the 111....or 112 if you want a slightly cleaner look. |
|
10 December 2013, 03:10 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,608
|
Totally agree with the sentiment here - 111 is a great reference to start with.
|
10 December 2013, 03:59 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
111
|
10 December 2013, 05:34 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Guillermo
Location: Bangkok
Watch: IWC, PAM, Rolex
Posts: 310
|
I like the 1950s like 312 and so forth, plus I like having the date and the in-house.
I also have a small wrist and I feel I can pull it off. But I am sure you have tried it already. Goodluck!!! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.