ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 March 2008, 09:37 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Acryllic vs Sapphere Crystal...
Hi, just killing time question where's do you like most the acryllic or sapphere crystal? Me, honestly more like to acryllic. The Rolex with acryllic look more beautiful to me. Maybe someday Rolex made shappere crystal with a acryllic model, who's know? What about you? Please your reply here. Thanks Guys!!!
Best Regards, TR. |
12 March 2008, 09:40 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I do like that the acryllic crystals are domed, but for everyday use I would prefer the sapphire crystals since they're (almost) scratch resistant. I hope that Rolex will introduced a domed sapphire crystal on (at least) the DJ like the current DD's have (as only models in the Rolex range, btw.).
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
12 March 2008, 10:15 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
For me the acryllic crystal will always have that special something sapphire can't give.
|
12 March 2008, 10:20 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,864
|
I agree with Mike. The plex crystal hides fingerprints, exhibits a rich luster, and can easily be polished back to new.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
12 March 2008, 10:22 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 72
|
Great picture Mike! Now I'm going to have to add a vintage model to my "buy list". I like the looks of the acryllic, but doesn't it scratch easily?
|
12 March 2008, 11:08 PM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,864
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
12 March 2008, 11:11 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
GREAT pic Mike as always!!! Acryllic more beauty I think.
|
12 March 2008, 11:25 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Sun City, Florida
Watch: DSSD Deepsea
Posts: 89
|
Acryllic all the way
The looks of acryllic is, to me, much more appealing.
__________________
Rolex 1011 Oyster Perpetual Rolex DSSD Rolex Airking Christopher Ward C4 |
13 March 2008, 12:09 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Neil Gader
Location: Studio City
Watch: Rolex 1680 Red Sub
Posts: 153
|
Does anyone know the difference in thickness between the Acrylic and the Sapphire? Does that difference account for the dome construction?
Neil Red Sub 3.3mil |
13 March 2008, 04:26 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Posts: 568
|
Acrylic for me
I've had both and I prefer acrylic every time. I sometimes get glare from a flat mineral crystal whereas the domed acrylic seems to let light through in a different way.
I think the acrylic is particularly nice without the cyclops. So smooth and clean, just beautiful. Here is my 40 year old 5513 sub. |
13 March 2008, 04:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: Buffalo
Watch: 16613 (blue dial)
Posts: 1,329
|
There's just something about acrylic. It's much "warmer."
|
13 March 2008, 06:21 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: north vancouver
Watch: 1680 / speedy pro
Posts: 474
|
Plastic is Fantastic. Hey that rhymes!
|
13 March 2008, 11:27 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
They don't look bad on an old GMT either.
|
13 March 2008, 12:17 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
Sapphire for me since it is durable for everyday use, but somehow acrylic looks warm for some reason. It also hides finger print very well.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
13 March 2008, 03:29 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 1675 Pepsi GMT
Posts: 181
|
^^Mike, those shots are killer! That GMT is pure perfection!
Acrylic hands down. I chose my Tudor Snowflake Sub and my 16030 DJ because of their warm vintage acrylic crystals. I lust for a 1675 or 16750 to complete the collection....oh and a 1680 if I can ever afford one. I just cleaned up my rough Tudor with some polywatch- that stuff works wonders! For good measure:
__________________
Rolex 1675 Pepsi GMT Master Tudor 9411/0 Snowflake Sub Tudor 76100 Tudor 76100 Non-Mercedes Hands Tudor Tiger 79280 Chronograph |
13 March 2008, 03:48 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Mike, you have all my DREAM watches...
|
13 March 2008, 07:32 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,350
|
I think I would still prefer Sapphire crystals over the arcylic ones. I think what makes me like them more are that they are reflective and are cut really smoothly as if they are perfectly flat. They are more durable despite that fact they can still shatter.
I do have a GMT with the older acrylic crystal. The crystal really grew on me, at first I thought it was okay but now I love it too! The acrylic crystal hides the cyclops too.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
13 March 2008, 11:17 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
|
Sapphire for me - although I certainly can see the point re acrylic crystals!
|
14 March 2008, 12:13 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
|
Gotta love the plastic!
__________________
|
14 March 2008, 01:25 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Delray Bch,FL,USA
Posts: 341
|
I have had both and like sapphire much better, Peter
|
10 January 2010, 07:59 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
True story. I was cutting the lawn last summer and my wife comes out the front door with a look of horror on her face and something in her hands. I turned off the mower and see perched on her palm my Datejust 16220 with a shattered crystal. She was tidying up the house and dropped the watch crystal down on the new tile floor in the kitchen. I was upset, but she felt really bad so I didn't lay into her too badly. Sapphire crystal.
6 months later, she needs me to set the time and date on her Datejust mid-size. I am in the kitchen, and she hands it to my 5 yo son to hand to me. He hands it to me and in the transfer it gets dropped, face down on the tile floor. Shattered. Also Sapphire. I guess at that point my wife and I were even. I put both watches away for a month, then found a watchmaker in CA who replaced both crystals and did a full service (there were pieces of crystal floating around the dial on both watches) for $900. OUCH. I sold my 16220, and my wife still wears her DJ. We never take the watches off in or near the kitchen. So, I now have a 1987 16030 DJ with acrylic crystal. Yes it has some scratches, but they can easily be buffed out with Polywatch, and if they are to deep for that, I can get them replaced much cheaper than sapphire. And I dont think it would shatter if dropped face down necessitating a full service. My 16610 Sub doesn't have even a single nick on its crystal and I wear it to change the oil in my cars, dive, shower, rotate tires. Go figure! |
10 January 2010, 08:12 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
On my 1601 and 1505 has crystal scratches, can someone post a link to buff out the scratches?
Thanks |
10 January 2010, 08:30 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: southern Calif
Posts: 632
|
I love the look and feel of acrylic.
DW |
10 January 2010, 08:40 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
Quote:
Seriously though, I just use Polywatch. Are you looking for a link on how to do it or where to buy Polywatch or similair? |
|
10 January 2010, 02:13 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
Nice thread and great pics of some classics. I have both and prefer saphire for my daily wear.
|
10 January 2010, 02:20 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,409
|
The acylic appeals to me
|
10 January 2010, 02:41 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: Oklahoma City
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 411
|
I love my old school acrylic crystal! :)
|
10 January 2010, 02:49 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Acrylic for me despite the increased risk of scratches....
How can you not love it??? |
10 January 2010, 02:53 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
I like the acrylic, but there is something cool about the anti-glare on several watch brands. Breitling has a blue tone sapphire. The acrylic does buff out easy on the buffer, and a very fine rouge. (Don't try it on your watch. practice on a spare crystal, and remove the acrylic before hitting it with a buffer) bad, aweful, nasty things can happen!
|
10 January 2010, 03:13 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 388
|
There is just something about the acrylic look....
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.