|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 September 2014, 07:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Philippines
Watch: AP ROC 26320 Black
Posts: 280
|
which would you choose from the 3
hi guys, im about to acquire my first pam and im confused between the following models:
320, 392 or a 233 would love hear opinions and see some wrist shots.. |
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 07:42 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,590
|
If it is in the running, 233 is almost always the right answer.
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 08:54 AM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
233 is the correct answer
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 08:57 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 09:11 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maine
Watch: Rolex 116660
Posts: 1,602
|
233 ftw!!
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 09:17 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 397
|
233 for me
__________________
Best Regards, Jayshan  ROLEX SUBMARINER 116610LN |
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 09:18 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jay
Location: Canada
Watch: 116520/PAM/PO2500
Posts: 293
|
233 will be my next PAM.
__________________
 116520 - 16570 - 16610LV - 16710pepsi - 116234 |
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 09:33 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Anthony
Location: California
Watch: Rolex/AP/Panerai
Posts: 1,641
|
No need to be confused, the 233 is the way to go from the choices you have.
__________________
 "You can never buy back Time, so spend it wisely." 
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 10:50 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,074
|
Have you tried any of them on... ?
The 320 is a 312 with GMT and the 392 is 2mm shy of a 312... . My guess is that they are all the same height as they all share the same 1950 case & P.9000 automatic mvmt. The 233, also a 1950, may be sightly thinner thanks to the P.2002 manual mvmt. Assuming they all fit you and fit is not a factor, then (naturally) I'll also recommend the 233! The dome crystal, additional complications (8 days!!!) and the fact that the P.2002 was OP's first in-house is enough to justify the price difference imho. Go used, go "dot" dial and you will be glad you did pick the 233 p.s. You want wristshots, we got wristshots
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 11:37 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom Corkery
Location: westchester ny
Watch: ap ro 15400
Posts: 502
|
233. had one and sold it for a jumbo, still miss it.
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 12:12 PM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 233
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 12:24 PM
|
#12 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,506
|
233 by far. The dome along with the 50' case makes it sleek and classy at the same time!
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 12:32 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Australia
Watch: GMT IIc BLNR
Posts: 363
|
233. Then the 392
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 12:54 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 01:12 PM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
28 September 2014, 02:09 PM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 571
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 07:03 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,046
|
another vote for 233
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 07:11 AM
|
#18 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Philippines
Watch: AP ROC 26320 Black
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
1. the 233 placed side by side onto the 320 ---> 320 grabbed my attention more because of the simplicity and clean dial. 2. on my wrist ---> the 233 sat a little better but the 320 wasnt odd and looked really good as well. 3. the 233 is a mechanical movement which kind of put me off compared to the automatic p.9000 movement on the 320 4. both are gmt which makes them equal 5. the price difference is quite hefty. im not new to pams as i've seen several of them over the years but i have never owned one before so i dont know if its the 1st impression but the 233's complication pushes me away. i dont know why but im kind of leaning towards the 320 for the robust yet clean and simple look. any further advise? |
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 07:39 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
I've always admired the GMT models- the Pam 98 being my personal favorite..
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 09:35 AM
|
#20 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I prefer the 320
The 233 is a great watch, but it's quite busy and much more expensive
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 11:36 AM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
233, way better fitting than the 312 or its ilk
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 12:16 PM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,217
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
29 September 2014, 09:30 PM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 16014 16610 372
Posts: 1,044
|
Get the 320, that way when you sell it to go get the 233 you can tell the story of how you should have gone straight for the 233 in the first place. It's a familiar tale. JK, get what you like. Which should be the 233. :)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
 He's a rebel and a runner
He's a signal turning green He's a restless young romantic Wants to run the big machine |
|
|
|
|
30 September 2014, 12:59 AM
|
#24 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Philippines
Watch: AP ROC 26320 Black
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 September 2014, 02:40 AM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: NJ
Watch: Pam Patek Rolex AP
Posts: 794
|
233... NO questions about this one.
|
|
|
|
|
30 September 2014, 12:07 PM
|
#26 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SP-SP-BRAZIL
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
It's a matter of "when", not "if". |
|
|
|
|
|
30 September 2014, 03:12 PM
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Cal
Location: London
Posts: 59
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
7 October 2014, 02:14 PM
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: PAM 171
Posts: 347
|
I think you have your answer.
2 3 3 ;-) |
|
|
|
|
7 October 2014, 02:51 PM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
392 all day long. My 2c. It's on my short list to buy and keep my Pam 88 company.
|
|
|
|
|
7 October 2014, 03:42 PM
|
#30 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
233! ��
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
