ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sunnyd · 26 December 2015, 03:31 AM

My wife's coworker just picked up a BLNR online, but something doesn't look right. What are your guys' thoughts? Is it legit?

Dashimmy · 26 December 2015, 03:39 AM

Not a pro but those sub dials and date look bad...

Briannourse · 26 December 2015, 03:40 AM

The blend is rather sharpe from blue to black the blend is better on the original. I have seen fake ones like this. That's a big giveaway straight off.

Also are the numbers etc white? Or just the photo.

Lordofrolex · 26 December 2015, 03:59 AM

Cyclops is very off. Date appears to be too small.

occb2 · 26 December 2015, 04:16 AM

The Batman is fake. The date wheel is completely the wrong font the paint on the bezel at the cut off 18 is a straight line, not like what it is. Also a real Rolex GMT hand stack for modern GMT's are hour hand then GMT hand then min hand then seconds. That one you see there is GMT hand then hour hand then minute hand then seconds. So fake.

Kyle13 · 26 December 2015, 04:24 AM

Pretty bad fake if you ask me. Tell him to return it as soon as possible hopefully he can get his money back

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

antbkny · 26 December 2015, 04:26 AM

Horrendous

Cryten · 26 December 2015, 04:29 AM

A very bad fake. You didn't mention if he thinks it's real or not.

occb2 · 26 December 2015, 04:33 AM

The MUL is fake too. The SEL fitment is way off. Never seen so many scratches on a sapphire crystal. The indy's don't meet the inside ring. So she is probably just buying fakes and knows it.

wisguy · 26 December 2015, 04:53 AM

Those two are very bad...

sunnyd · 26 December 2015, 05:04 AM

Thanks for the responses guys. I think he's afraid that it's not real and he's taking it to get checked out at an AD tomorrow. I guess he's in for some bad news...

crowncollection · 26 December 2015, 07:05 AM

Fake for sure

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thailawson · 26 December 2015, 07:09 AM

Looks fishy.

WhatTheDeuce · 26 December 2015, 07:19 AM

Bezel looks odd...

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sublover2166 · 26 December 2015, 08:34 AM

Total Fakeroo. Everything about that watch is wrong! Not even close, no cigar.

Wahlberg · 26 December 2015, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunnyd

Thanks for the responses guys. I think he's afraid that it's not real and he's taking it to get checked out at an AD tomorrow. I guess he's in for some bad news...

Where did he get it?

nick c · 26 December 2015, 09:31 AM

Big fake the Blnr

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 26 December 2015, 01:06 PM

Blnr fake no question

Andad · 26 December 2015, 05:06 PM

As has been said.

Nairn1980 · 26 December 2015, 05:51 PM

Awful blnr

airdefencer · 27 December 2015, 12:57 AM

fake 100% sorry about this

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

vman · 28 December 2015, 11:30 AM

The bracelet alone makes me cringe. BTW, you may want to tell your friend 'bout the Milgauss...

Watchurself · 29 December 2015, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vman

The bracelet alone makes me cringe. BTW, you may want to tell your friend 'bout the Milgauss...

I think the Milgauss is the OP's which looks okay to me.

egancarz · 29 December 2015, 11:58 AM

Unless they recently changed the bezel numbers from platinum to white, I'd say that...plus the awful date font and cyclops are the most glaring problems.....

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

BubbaDoo · 29 December 2015, 12:14 PM

man that milgauss is beat

TimothyNelson · 29 December 2015, 02:25 PM

Makes me sad. :(

Sent from my LG-P769 using Tapatalk

MilgaussBe · 30 December 2015, 04:25 AM

Instant give-away is the font of the date and the magnification.

Upon closer inspection:
Depth and colour of the numbers on the bezel
colour of the blue cerachrom (should be more dark in the light the photo was taken)
the blue colouring of the GMT-hand is off, too short, not up to the arrow
the steel and PCLs don't look/have the shine of Rolex 904L steel
the white 'Luminova' looks off as well.

Hope the buyer didn't pay thousands of dollars.

phatotto · 30 December 2015, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MilgaussBe

Instant give-away is the font of the date and the magnification.

Upon closer inspection:
Depth and colour of the numbers on the bezel
colour of the blue cerachrom (should be more dark in the light the photo was taken)
the blue colouring of the GMT-hand is off, too short, not up to the arrow
the steel and PCLs don't look/have the shine of Rolex 904L steel
the white 'Luminova' looks off as well.

Hope the buyer didn't pay thousands of dollars.

just to start!!... WAY bad

One Ping Only · 30 December 2015, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vman

The bracelet alone makes me cringe..

That is what caught my eye, then the date font.

Mickyfin · 30 December 2015, 05:06 AM

Both watches in photo are fake. Look at the lume on the Mil.

26 December 2015, 03:31 AM	#1
sunnyd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: CA Watch: me watch you Posts: 459	BLNR - Real or Fake My wife's coworker just picked up a BLNR online, but something doesn't look right. What are your guys' thoughts? Is it legit? __________________ 116610LVc 1803 Wideboy 1680 Red MKIV

26 December 2015, 03:59 AM	#4
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,690	Cyclops is very off. Date appears to be too small. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

26 December 2015, 04:53 AM	#10
wisguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,406	Those two are very bad... __________________ 5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation

26 December 2015, 05:04 AM	#11
sunnyd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: CA Watch: me watch you Posts: 459	Thanks for the responses guys. I think he's afraid that it's not real and he's taking it to get checked out at an AD tomorrow. I guess he's in for some bad news... __________________ 116610LVc 1803 Wideboy 1680 Red MKIV

26 December 2015, 07:05 AM	#12
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,165	Fake for sure Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

26 December 2015, 03:39 AM	#2
Dashimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Heath Location: Elkton Ky Watch: Submariner Posts: 354	Not a pro but those sub dials and date look bad...

26 December 2015, 03:40 AM	#3
Briannourse "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bristol Posts: 61	The blend is rather sharpe from blue to black the blend is better on the original. I have seen fake ones like this. That's a big giveaway straight off. Also are the numbers etc white? Or just the photo.

26 December 2015, 04:16 AM	#5
occb2 Banned Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Robert Location: New York Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 321	The Batman is fake. The date wheel is completely the wrong font the paint on the bezel at the cut off 18 is a straight line, not like what it is. Also a real Rolex GMT hand stack for modern GMT's are hour hand then GMT hand then min hand then seconds. That one you see there is GMT hand then hour hand then minute hand then seconds. So fake.

26 December 2015, 04:24 AM	#6
Kyle13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 484	Pretty bad fake if you ask me. Tell him to return it as soon as possible hopefully he can get his money back Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

26 December 2015, 04:26 AM	#7
antbkny "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Anthony Location: Brooklyn, NY Watch: Dblue Posts: 6,723	Horrendous

26 December 2015, 04:29 AM	#8
Cryten "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Terrafirma Posts: 2,655	A very bad fake. You didn't mention if he thinks it's real or not.

26 December 2015, 04:33 AM	#9
occb2 Banned Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Robert Location: New York Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 321	The MUL is fake too. The SEL fitment is way off. Never seen so many scratches on a sapphire crystal. The indy's don't meet the inside ring. So she is probably just buying fakes and knows it.

26 December 2015, 07:09 AM	#13
Thailawson "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: South Posts: 187	Looks fishy.

26 December 2015, 07:19 AM	#14
WhatTheDeuce "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Kyung Location: Anywhere? Watch: cha want... Posts: 4,487	Bezel looks odd... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @whatthedeuce_

26 December 2015, 08:34 AM	#15
Sublover2166 Banned Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: John Location: Manassas,Virginia Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk Posts: 2,871	Total Fakeroo. Everything about that watch is wrong! Not even close, no cigar.

26 December 2015, 09:31 AM	#17
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Big fake the Blnr

26 December 2015, 01:06 PM	#18
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	Blnr fake no question __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

26 December 2015, 05:06 PM	#19
Andad 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 36,951	As has been said. __________________ E

26 December 2015, 05:51 PM	#20
Nairn1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: UK Watch: GMT Posts: 8,270	Awful blnr

27 December 2015, 12:57 AM	#21
airdefencer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seoul Posts: 2	fake 100% sorry about this Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

28 December 2015, 11:30 AM	#22
vman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Capt Swerve Location: North Carolina Watch: less TV Posts: 2,224	The bracelet alone makes me cringe. BTW, you may want to tell your friend 'bout the Milgauss...

29 December 2015, 11:58 AM	#24
egancarz "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: New Hampshire Posts: 2	Unless they recently changed the bezel numbers from platinum to white, I'd say that...plus the awful date font and cyclops are the most glaring problems..... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

29 December 2015, 12:14 PM	#25
BubbaDoo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: United States Watch: 1501, 116400 GV Posts: 44	man that milgauss is beat

29 December 2015, 02:25 PM	#26
TimothyNelson "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Timothy Nelson Location: Minnesota Watch: 18038 Posts: 377	Makes me sad. :( Sent from my LG-P769 using Tapatalk __________________ Best, Timothy

30 December 2015, 04:25 AM	#27
MilgaussBe "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: EU Watch: GV Z-blue/BLNR Posts: 210	Instant give-away is the font of the date and the magnification. Upon closer inspection: Depth and colour of the numbers on the bezel colour of the blue cerachrom (should be more dark in the light the photo was taken) the blue colouring of the GMT-hand is off, too short, not up to the arrow the steel and PCLs don't look/have the shine of Rolex 904L steel the white 'Luminova' looks off as well. Hope the buyer didn't pay thousands of dollars.

30 December 2015, 05:06 AM	#30
Mickyfin "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Michael Location: Suomi Watch: Planet Ocean Posts: 334	Both watches in photo are fake. Look at the lume on the Mil.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)