The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 February 2016, 06:19 AM   #1
Watchurself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 340
AP ROO Lava (LE of 99) - Thoughts, Opinions?

Looking for a new AP and was wondering if anyone here had any personal experience with the AP Lava LE of 99. I've attached a pic for reference for those who have no idea what I'm talking about. For a do it all AP, do you think it's a bit flashy or too over the top? I've tried to find pics online, but it's hard to get a glimpse of what the watch looks like in real life.

I'm a serial flipper and wonder if I should hold out for something else. I currently have a 42mm 26170 but really want something ceramic with an open caseback (possibly the diver). My wrists are 6.25" and really don't think I could move up to the 44mm (26400) which I think is stunning - apart from the size. I have an opportunity to pick one up for a good price, and wanted the input of fellow enthusiasts. Any thoughts?

Watchurself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 06:42 AM   #2
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
Will it be your one and only? The color could clash if you wear it everyday, but that could also depend on you and your style.

I had seriously considered it at one point, thought it'd go well with my Flyers hockey jersey and my hair...

I wouldn't call it flashy at all. Though if you are considering the ceramic diver, my preference would be for it: 1) its ceramic (think lava is PVD?) and 2) strap is more comfortable 3) I just like its look better.

But that me....do you actually want it, or is it in your head since it was offered at a good price...? As a serial flipper, make sure it's a good enough deal so that you aren't hurt too bad when selling
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 08:48 AM   #3
Watchurself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 340
I also have a Rolex 116710 that I wear pretty much all the time since I don't like the bracelet on my current AP. I honestly probably only want it because it's a good deal, and because I've wanted to try a ceramic AP for some time. The fact that its n/99 also makes it a little more special since I'm likely never to see one in the wild.

My work environment is pretty casual/laid back so I don't think it would be a problem there. Have you seen one in person? If so, was the color really bright or more subdued?
Watchurself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:01 AM   #4
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,294
If you like orange I think this is pretty cool. Prefer it to the Volcano.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:01 AM   #5
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,012
Be careful as the PVD will come off in daily use. Shame as it is a nice edition.
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:32 AM   #6
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
Justmy opinion, but I think if you like thelook, you are better off sourcing for a Ceramic Diver. Never much a fan of PVD.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:51 AM   #7
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,683
If you are a flipper may want to check the liquidity of a piece like that. Also, if it is a good deal usually there is a reason - not a deep market for the piece or too good to be true. Don't chase the deal.

Agree on above go ceramic and not pvd.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 11:10 AM   #8
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
If you are a flipper may want to check the liquidity of a piece like that. Also, if it is a good deal usually there is a reason - not a deep market for the piece or too good to be true. Don't chase the deal.

Agree on above go ceramic and not pvd.
Agreed, also!

I have some experience with a Lava live...it's not super popular per se, but if you're getting it for a steal, then why not. You'll have to decide what a steal means for you, though.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 11:49 AM   #9
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
Be careful as the PVD will come off in daily use. Shame as it is a nice edition.
^^ Very wise words
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 11:50 AM   #10
Watchurself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 340
I think I agree with the majority here that it may be better to hold off for now. I realize I'm likely interested in the watch for the wrong reasons, and I'll probably become bored with it in ~6 months and wanna flip again.

Maybe just pick a day and take the time to go to the closest AD (3 hours away) to actually get some hands on experience with some other models. I'm worried that if I rush into a decision I'll most likely just cost myself more money in the long run.
Watchurself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 07:44 PM   #11
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Looks awesome! You have me going chrono24 right now! Much nicer than the Volcano IMO.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:28 PM   #12
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Ok it's nice but if it's PVD that sucks, if DLC it's already better, though I think ceramic is still better, and lighter, really a cool watch to have and wear and I recommend it as I love mine, plus on the CE diver both crowns are ceramic, way better than rubber IMO
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2016, 10:36 PM   #13
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Yes, the coating is the problem...

The plots that holds the bracelet on my Bumblebee where shot, but AP are giving me new ones free of charge on an exchange basis.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2016, 06:04 AM   #14
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchurself View Post
I think I agree with the majority here that it may be better to hold off for now. I realize I'm likely interested in the watch for the wrong reasons, and I'll probably become bored with it in ~6 months and wanna flip again.

Maybe just pick a day and take the time to go to the closest AD (3 hours away) to actually get some hands on experience with some other models. I'm worried that if I rush into a decision I'll most likely just cost myself more money in the long run.
good call!
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.