The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 July 2008, 03:31 PM   #1
crusader
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Searcy, AR
Watch: DJ 116203LXY
Posts: 27
Icon20 The Name "DateJust"

I'm guessing that Rolex wanted to draw some distinction between their watch model that has both the day and the date and their model that has "just the date". But am I the only one that thinks that DateJust is a strange name for a watch model? It just seems like an over-simplification to me. It also sounds like a name that a child might come up with.

The DJ is still a beautiful watch no matter what it's called!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Rolex DJ 116203LXY0174.JPG (73.7 KB, 357 views)
crusader is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 03:53 PM   #2
Spark
"TRF" Member
 
Spark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Mark
Location: U.K.
Watch: Too Many
Posts: 2,092
The Date-Just was introduced 11 years before the Day-Date and was actually the first watch to have the date displayed on the dial at 3 o'clock through a window in the dial, prior to this it was usually done using a hand pointer.
So with that in mind the Just is unlikely to be for Just a Date as Rolex would have been quite proud of their new model, but I must say I've never investigated the reason for Date-Just.
Spark is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 04:32 PM   #3
pwrslider
"TRF" Member
 
pwrslider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
Bo would know......but Bo has left the building!!
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95)
Rolex SS GMT IIc (08)
Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..)
Rolex Explorer II Blk (91)
Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07)
Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03)
pwrslider is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 05:27 PM   #4
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
The DJ..............ideal for those who want JUST a DATE and nothing else from a watch!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 06:06 PM   #5
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The DJ..............ideal for those who want JUST a DATE and nothing else from a watch!!
At least the watch doesn't expect me to buy dinner for it.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline  
Old 25 July 2008, 06:14 PM   #6
arttay10
"TRF" Member
 
arttay10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lancashire, UK
Watch: ????????
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art161 View Post
At least the watch doesn't expect me to buy dinner for it.
no - but lets face it Arthur, they are just as costly......
arttay10 is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 12:21 AM   #7
llamaofdoom
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 417
Short for "Date Adjust". Why "Date Adjust", I do not know.
llamaofdoom is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 12:38 AM   #8
gsgarbear2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: Utah, USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 156
From what I've read, the "Just" portion of "Datejust" means "Just in time" meaning the date changes at midnight, being just in time. Correct me if I am wrong.
gsgarbear2 is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 12:39 AM   #9
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art161 View Post
At least the watch doesn't expect me to buy dinner for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arttay10 View Post
no - but lets face it Arthur, they are just as costly......
The Rolex is inexpensive by comparison.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 12:44 AM   #10
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
i wonder too as you have the date models too?
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 01:00 AM   #11
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by toph View Post
i wonder too as you have the date models too?
I have a somewhat old Date watch and a Datejust watch. Apparently the new Date watches are different from the older ones. There is no QuickSet feature on my Date watch, but there is on my Datejust watch.

From what I have been reading on this forum, the only difference between the current Date and Datejust watches is that the former is 34 mm and the latter is 36 mm. I am at a loss as to why Rolex would manufacture watches with different names if the only difference is 2 mm in size.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 01:12 AM   #12
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,158
According to "The Best Of Time" Dowling-Hess, Rolex had originally registered the name "Ritedate", however, Wilsdorf wanted to name it "Victory" after the recent Allied victories.

It further states that "...on the occasion of the celebration of the 40th jubilee of the founding of Rolex, it was called "Datejust" and the model was "Jubilee", although the name came later to be applied only to the bracelet of the new watch."
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 01:41 AM   #13
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsgarbear2 View Post
From what I've read, the "Just" portion of "Datejust" means "Just in time" meaning the date changes at midnight, being just in time. Correct me if I am wrong.
I thought it was to capture the concept of an Adjusting Date watch
BigHat is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 02:11 AM   #14
mgm
"TRF" Member
 
mgm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Rolex had originally registered the name "Ritedate"
Both the word "adjust" and "just" have the same root, "just" implying right, based in truth, and "adjust" being toward the truth. Since the original intention is Ritedate, and rite (why do they do that with spelling?!!) meaning the right date, Datejust is merely a word reversal of the intended meaning. Could as well have called it Daterite...
__________________
Gregory
mgm is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 02:42 AM   #15
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,158
So, from a Swiss to English interpretation and understanding perspective, the word "DateJust", could be understood to be nothing more than "Visually, and accurately, showing the correct date"
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 02:48 AM   #16
michaelhutchinson
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 30
I have also always been intrigued by the name. Particularly as the Datejust was preceded by the Date. One theory I had was that when it was launched, and for some time after, it was only available with the JUbilee STrap.......JUST a thought!!!
michaelhutchinson is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 03:10 AM   #17
mgm
"TRF" Member
 
mgm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
So, from a Swiss to English interpretation and understanding perspective, the word "DateJust", could be understood to be nothing more than "Visually, and accurately, showing the correct date"
Yes, with the adjective following the noun, as in Latin (the other international language) and ensuing Romance languages...
__________________
Gregory
mgm is offline  
Old 26 July 2008, 04:03 AM   #18
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
I always thought the original "Datejust" could have the date adjusted by swinging the hands back and forth across midnight rather than all the way through the 24 hour cycle.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline  
Old 17 September 2008, 04:33 PM   #19
jeff hess
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Jeffrey P Hess
Location: florida
Watch: Patek and Ball
Posts: 516
So, from a Swiss to English interpretation and understanding perspective, the word "DateJust", could be understood to be nothing more than "Visually, and accurately, showing the correct date"
===========================

Gregory and Tools are probably correct. Wilsdorf was a name junkie who scooped up many many names. And he strove for simple names that could be understood in many languages.

Jeff
jeff hess is offline  
Old 17 September 2008, 04:50 PM   #20
C. Davidson
"TRF" Member
 
C. Davidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: WXSW
Watch: GMT (116710)
Posts: 2,723
2 more cents...

Quote from WatchTime, October 2004, The Status Symbol, Gisbert L. Brunner:

Rolex wanted to introduce a date display watch to mark the firm's 40th birthday in 1945. The Datejust (Caliber 740) was a world's first, becoming an archetype that would influence the technology and appearance of generations of subsequent watches. The watch's name was carefully selected: "Date" is self-explanatory, while "Just" stands for "just in time". And this means that the date display advances to show the next day's date without delay at midnight.
__________________
-Cheers, Chris
#15,634

"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out."
C. Davidson is offline  
Old 17 September 2008, 07:26 PM   #21
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. Davidson View Post
And this means that the date display advances to show the next day's date without delay at midnight.
I suppose in fine print it read "give or take a few minutes"
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline  
Old 17 September 2008, 10:19 PM   #22
VtailFlyer
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsgarbear2 View Post
From what I've read, the "Just" portion of "Datejust" means "Just in time" meaning the date changes at midnight, being just in time. Correct me if I am wrong.
You are correct sir. No correction necessary.
VtailFlyer is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.