The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 September 2008, 06:42 AM   #1
fania123
"TRF" Member
 
fania123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,720
Who else thinks?

The new Sea Dwellers would be sellin for close to 20k had the milgauss held there prices. I think the the drop in price on the second hand market rattled people. No matter to me I love my deep sea.
fania123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 06:48 AM   #2
astcell
"TRF" Member
 
astcell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
The same happened with Kermit. Anything new stirs up the pot. When things settle down the market will adjust.

I remember how the Ford Focus was supposed to be the car everyone wanted, remember that? The DSSD will settle down as soon as another Basel kicks off.
__________________
SS GMTII "D", TT GMTIIc "Z"
astcell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 09:51 AM   #3
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,140
Neither the Milgauss or the Deep Sea could sustain the ridiculous prices people were asking for once they were out in the market place. I don't think anybody was rattled except for those who paid too much for one.

The second hand market has nothing to do with it if you can get a brand new one for MSRP at most Dealers.. The second hand market can only demand high prices if new pieces are not available and that becomes the only source..

__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 11:55 AM   #4
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Exactly what Larry said The SDDS seems to be way more available than the Milgauss was initially, it appears that everyone is getting them .
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 12:06 PM   #5
astcell
"TRF" Member
 
astcell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
A local dealer says the floodgates are opened and now Daytonas will be readily available next.
__________________
SS GMTII "D", TT GMTIIc "Z"
astcell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 12:38 PM   #6
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by fania123 View Post
The new Sea Dwellers would be sellin for close to 20k had the milgauss held there prices. I think the the drop in price on the second hand market rattled people. No matter to me I love my deep sea.
I disagree - the SDDS was never meant to be a limited or hard to find model. It's just people who want to be the first to own it who really send the demand sky high. Wait until people come to their senses and notice just how many are being sold.
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 04:59 PM   #7
C. Davidson
"TRF" Member
 
C. Davidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: WXSW
Watch: GMT (116710)
Posts: 2,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by astcell View Post
A local dealer says the floodgates are opened and now Daytonas will be readily available next.
I understand where you are coming from and have heard something similiar from my local AD. Perhaps the cause for this is not an increase in production, but the general increase in the Daytona's MSRP over the past 7 years. As the Daytona MSRP reaches secondary market value, I can see people asking themselves; "Why pay X price for used when I can get it for the same price at my local AD?" It should be interesting to see what that exact price is and when it happens.
__________________
-Cheers, Chris
#15,634

"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out."
C. Davidson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 05:08 PM   #8
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. Davidson View Post
I understand where you are coming from and have heard something similiar from my local AD. Perhaps the cause for this is not an increase in production, but the general increase in the Daytona's MSRP over the past 7 years. As the Daytona MSRP reaches secondary market value, I can see people asking themselves; "Why pay X price for used when I can get it for the same price at my local AD?" It should be interesting to see what that exact price is and when it happens.
Grey market prices *should* have increased accordingly...it's not like SS Daytonas are sitting out in windows these days. True test of the Daytona market will be after the next price increase.
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 05:30 PM   #9
C. Davidson
"TRF" Member
 
C. Davidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: WXSW
Watch: GMT (116710)
Posts: 2,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottschoe View Post
I disagree - the SDDS was never meant to be a limited or hard to find model. It's just people who want to be the first to own it who really send the demand sky high. Wait until people come to their senses and notice just how many are being sold.
I couldn't agree with Scott more on this.

IMHO the SDDS was meant to be a high production piece and a direct competitor to the larger sport timepieces out there (Breitlings/Panerais/Omegas etc.) Rolex wants to sell as many Deep Sea's as possible and is not too concerned about the secondary market value falling due to a sharp increase in production/supply.

Rolex usually has a soft launch for any new model and some speculators misinterpret this to mean that X timepiece is going to be limited in production.
__________________
-Cheers, Chris
#15,634

"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out."
C. Davidson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 05:59 PM   #10
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. Davidson View Post
I couldn't agree with Scott more on this.

IMHO the SDDS was meant to be a high production piece and a direct competitor to the larger sport timepieces out there (Breitlings/Panerais/Omegas etc.) Rolex wants to sell as many Deep Sea's as possible and is not too concerned about the secondary market value falling due to a sharp increase in production/supply.

Rolex usually has a soft launch for any new model and some speculators misinterpret this to mean that X timepiece is going to be limited in production.
Yes I think you're right about the Deep Sea being a normal (maybe not "high'') production piece. In Singapore, the watch was officially launched on Aug 29 in the newspapers with the slogan "Discover a New Species of the Deep'', with the side profile depicted (I'll try to put a pix of the ad on TRF once I've got my camera sorted). It's very rare that Rolex advertise a specific model like this if their ADs won't have sufficient stock, so I'm guessing that in due course, supply won't be that much of a problem as it is now.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 07:33 PM   #11
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
The simple fact that Rolex announced (almost simultaneously) the release of the DSSD along with the fact it would discontinue production of the SD marked the fact that the DSSD was always intended to take over the SD market IMO. Since the SD was never offered as a limited production, ultra-rare watch, I never thought for a minute the DSSD would be especially hard to get your hands on (after initial release craze dies down of course). In 6 months to a year nobody will even think of putting the words 'DSSD' and 'limited production' in the same sentence.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2008, 11:35 PM   #12
SD090608
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: The South
Watch: M Sea Dweller
Posts: 64
Yeah, I never understood why someone would pay 18large to someone that's not an AD, even if they had to have one NOW...the watches are starting to trickle out and the ADs will sell them at MSRP with all the bennies that go with buying from an AD.

What I think is particularly sad is that Rolex won't service the watch if it wasn't purchased from an AD, and something tells me that the folks that got scalped may not have realized that. Caveat Emptor, huh?

Be careful.
SD090608 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2008, 12:12 AM   #13
astcell
"TRF" Member
 
astcell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
I'd like the folks who paid 2-3x MSRP to chime in on how they feel now, and if they would do it again. it is a crapshoot.
__________________
SS GMTII "D", TT GMTIIc "Z"
astcell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.