ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mic6 · 13 January 2017, 06:43 PM

Battle of the classics
If you were going to keep only one
16610 M full set mint
16710 Z full set mint

Please vote

Thanks :)

CRM114 · 13 January 2017, 07:00 PM

The 16710 all the way.

As waterproof as you'll ever need, a useful complication (display of 2nd/3rd time zones), and the ability to easily switch inserts from the BLRO to an all-black LN or black & red "Coke" insert as well as wearing well with a Jubilee if you want gives it unmatched aesthetic versatility.

sensui · 13 January 2017, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRM114

The 16710 all the way.

As waterproof as you'll ever need, a useful complication (display of 2nd/3rd time zones), and the ability to easily switch inserts from the BLRO to an all-black LN or black & red "Coke" insert as well as wearing well with a Jubilee if you want gives it an unmatched aesthetic versatility.

What he said.

Marcus09 · 13 January 2017, 07:20 PM

Gmt all the way. I never dive. I prefer gmt's functions more.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Marcus09 · 13 January 2017, 07:22 PM

btw, i couldn't help but notice the "RolexRolexRolex" markings you did with the 16610. very nice!

Andad · 13 January 2017, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcus09

btw, i couldn't help but notice the "RolexRolexRolex" markings you did with the 16610. very nice!

Not sure of your point M?

Andad · 13 January 2017, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcus09

btw, i couldn't help but notice the "RolexRolexRolex" markings you did with the 16610. very nice!

nice pix.

Black Bay Dan · 13 January 2017, 07:26 PM

I prefer a Submariner over a GMT II, however in this instance I would keep the Pepsi because if you change your mind I think finding another 16610 would be easier than finding another 16710 in that condition. Good luck.

Dan

ag986 · 14 January 2017, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Air King Dan

I prefer a Submariner over a GMT II, however in this instance I would keep the Pepsi because if you change your mind I think finding another 16610 would be easier than finding another 16710 in that condition. Good luck.

Dan

A difficult decision, but I agree.

Andad · 13 January 2017, 07:44 PM

Is that a 3185 or 3186 Pepsi?

Either way that is the one.

Onikage · 13 January 2017, 07:54 PM

You know which I'd pick.

yannis · 13 January 2017, 08:00 PM

16710 in a heartbeat. I would be more indecisive if it was a 16610 LV.

Zoongz · 13 January 2017, 08:04 PM

👈

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk

Benjo74 · 13 January 2017, 08:06 PM

GMT

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mailman · 13 January 2017, 08:17 PM

Between those two I'd keep the 16710. If the Submariner were a 16610LV my answer would be different

branman1986 · 14 January 2017, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mailman

Between those two I'd keep the 16710. If the Submariner were a 16610LV my answer would be different

My sentiments exactly

donut · 13 January 2017, 08:30 PM

I would keep 16710 z complete set.

The Libertine · 13 January 2017, 08:35 PM

The 16710. Prefer my Submariner without the date; however, think the cyclops looks great on the GMT.

capote · 13 January 2017, 09:01 PM

GMT > Submariner

uncleluck · 13 January 2017, 09:06 PM

Gmt

HL65 · 13 January 2017, 09:08 PM

16710

GMT Aviator · 13 January 2017, 09:21 PM

It's a no brainer.

16710 GMT.

osamu · 13 January 2017, 09:23 PM

gotta agree with the 16710, it's a classic.

Not that the 16610 isn't, but the 16710 screams classic Rolex, and yours looks like a beautiful example.

BigCFM · 13 January 2017, 09:31 PM

I love a sub but in this instance it would be the GMT.

THC · 13 January 2017, 10:00 PM

Why can't both stay? They look so happy together

sgmgolf · 13 January 2017, 10:02 PM

16710 for me

Mezz72 · 13 January 2017, 11:07 PM

keep the gmt and replace the sub with a lv

jmolsberg · 13 January 2017, 11:15 PM

Gmt
Now if that was a no date sub then sub

natosub · 13 January 2017, 11:16 PM

Subs are my favorite, but prefer the Submariner to the Sub Date. In this instance, 16710 all the way. Looks to be a gorgeous example!

Loevhagen · 14 January 2017, 12:16 AM

Voted 16610, if 16610LV. If just a boring 16610; 16710 any day.

View Poll Results: Which one would you keep
16610	54	19.29%
16710	226	80.71%
Voters: 280. You may not vote on this poll

13 January 2017, 07:20 PM	#4
Marcus09 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Batman Location: Gotham City Posts: 1,184	Gmt all the way. I never dive. I prefer gmt's functions more. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________

13 January 2017, 07:26 PM	#8
Black Bay Dan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Dan Location: Chichester Watch: Tudor Black Bay Posts: 1,537	I prefer a Submariner over a GMT II, however in this instance I would keep the Pepsi because if you change your mind I think finding another 16610 would be easier than finding another 16710 in that condition. Good luck. Dan __________________ Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79220R (2015) Tudor Black Bay GMT 79830RB (2022) Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight 79030B (2023)

13 January 2017, 07:44 PM	#10
Andad 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 36,945	Is that a 3185 or 3186 Pepsi? Either way that is the one. __________________ E

13 January 2017, 07:54 PM	#11
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	You know which I'd pick. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

13 January 2017, 07:00 PM	#2
CRM114 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: HK & USA Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV Posts: 2,001	The 16710 all the way. As waterproof as you'll ever need, a useful complication (display of 2nd/3rd time zones), and the ability to easily switch inserts from the BLRO to an all-black LN or black & red "Coke" insert as well as wearing well with a Jubilee if you want gives it unmatched aesthetic versatility.

13 January 2017, 07:22 PM	#5
Marcus09 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Batman Location: Gotham City Posts: 1,184	btw, i couldn't help but notice the "RolexRolexRolex" markings you did with the 16610. very nice!

13 January 2017, 08:00 PM	#12
yannis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Yannis Location: Europe Watch: maniac Posts: 9,070	16710 in a heartbeat. I would be more indecisive if it was a 16610 LV. __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV \| Tudor 79220N DSSD MEMBERS - OWNERS CLUB

13 January 2017, 08:04 PM	#13
Zoongz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Singapore Posts: 13	👈 Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk

13 January 2017, 08:06 PM	#14
Benjo74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Posts: 1,125	GMT Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 January 2017, 08:17 PM	#15
mailman TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,388	Between those two I'd keep the 16710. If the Submariner were a 16610LV my answer would be different __________________ JJ

13 January 2017, 08:30 PM	#17
donut "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jerry Location: Unseen Thailand Watch: LN/LV/BLNR Posts: 543	I would keep 16710 z complete set.

13 January 2017, 08:35 PM	#18
The Libertine Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: BOS Watch: 16710;14060;214270 Posts: 6,375	The 16710. Prefer my Submariner without the date; however, think the cyclops looks great on the GMT.

13 January 2017, 09:01 PM	#19
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	GMT > Submariner

13 January 2017, 09:06 PM	#20
uncleluck "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: England Posts: 518	Gmt

13 January 2017, 09:08 PM	#21
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,485	16710 __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

13 January 2017, 09:21 PM	#22
GMT Aviator 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: London Posts: 3,289	It's a no brainer. 16710 GMT.

13 January 2017, 09:23 PM	#23
osamu "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Honolulu Posts: 1,322	gotta agree with the 16710, it's a classic. Not that the 16610 isn't, but the 16710 screams classic Rolex, and yours looks like a beautiful example.

13 January 2017, 09:31 PM	#24
BigCFM "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Chris Location: London Watch: this Space [ ] Posts: 1,830	I love a sub but in this instance it would be the GMT.

13 January 2017, 10:00 PM	#25
THC 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Tom Location: Mandeville La Watch: 16610M Posts: 10,519	Why can't both stay? They look so happy together

13 January 2017, 10:02 PM	#26
sgmgolf "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: MA Watch: 16600,16710,Tudor Posts: 1,372	16710 for me

13 January 2017, 11:07 PM	#27
Mezz72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 618	keep the gmt and replace the sub with a lv

13 January 2017, 11:15 PM	#28
jmolsberg "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Jan-Michael Location: Fort Worth Watch: ROLEX Posts: 423	Gmt Now if that was a no date sub then sub

13 January 2017, 11:16 PM	#29
natosub "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: USA Watch: the tide roll in.. Posts: 1,138	Subs are my favorite, but prefer the Submariner to the Sub Date. In this instance, 16710 all the way. Looks to be a gorgeous example!

14 January 2017, 12:16 AM	#30
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,934	Voted 16610, if 16610LV. If just a boring 16610; 16710 any day.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)