ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Maiden · 30 January 2017, 01:00 PM

Hi all, I know I will ultimately have to make the decision, but would appreciate some members feedback and experiences. I currently own a 114060 and a 116613lb. I prefer the six digit subs and love all the upgrades. I am currently thinking of adding a solid gold sub and I am finding I like the look of the five digit version better. I just find it a little more elegant and with a solid gold piece, the visual mass/presence might just be a little too much with the six digit version. I recently purchased a 36mm day date for this reason and I am quite happy with that vs the 40mm or DD2

So what do you think? Has anyone had the same dilemma or owned both? Cost is not an issue, so part of me thinks I would be crazy to give up the glidelock and all the upgrades. First world problems I know.

cheers

watchwatcher · 30 January 2017, 01:25 PM

Six digit for me. With thr heaviness of a solid gold watch, I want the best fit possible.

malarky_hk · 30 January 2017, 01:39 PM

I don't think it makes a difference between a 5 or 6 digit YG Sub - elegance would not be a word I'd associate with a YG Sub.

The glide lock is reason alone to get the 6 digit reference.

gossbeau · 30 January 2017, 01:42 PM

Man that was a first world problem!!!

I think you should go for the latter with the glidelock. It is an awesome watch. I, however, think that since you own already 2 subs, you should try something a bit different. You can find a mint YG Yachtmaster with the blue dial for even less. You get something way less common but still with that diver look. Also, since you mentioned that you wanted something a bit more subtle. I think the size is the same than the 16618.

a7ac9546d9e40d66d6f7f7881c75d822.jpg

imgrc0068457689.jpg

Bigsykedaddy · 30 January 2017, 01:46 PM

6 digit for me all day.

Although I do agree with you on the Day Date. I originally was going to go for the 40 mm and after trying on the 36 mm I think it wears better on my wrist for that particular model.

bobabreath · 30 January 2017, 01:47 PM

I have the classic 16618 and enjoy it. The slimmer case is just more elegant than the ceramic version. Sure, Glidelock has its advantages, but if you don't find yourself needing the adjustment, there is no functional benefit. Also I like being able to easily change out the aluminum inserts. The bezel pearl of the ceramic bezel is fragile and easily damaged. I view it as the Achilles heel of the newer models.

Al1969 · 30 January 2017, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by malarky_hk

I don't think it makes a difference between a 5 or 6 digit YG Sub - elegance would not be a word I'd associate with a YG Sub.

The glide lock is reason alone to get the 6 digit reference.

Al1969 · 30 January 2017, 01:51 PM

Go with the later reference . The glidelock is great.

GB-man · 30 January 2017, 01:56 PM

For me the 1680/8 is the only choice!

That said, between the two I would go 16618. Sounds like it is what you want. You should always go with your gut.

Flstfirider · 30 January 2017, 02:54 PM

The glide lock clasp is nice...but the 16618 has a bit more character ��

LuminousMaximus · 30 January 2017, 03:15 PM

to compare the one above...

6 digit is hot!

Flstfirider · 30 January 2017, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuminousMaximus

to compare the one above...

6 digit is hot!

Yes it is....but I have a 5 digit, that I need to promote 😊

You can't go wrong with either.

dadonn2 · 30 January 2017, 03:32 PM

As one of those less refined sorts who really likes the heft on their wrist, and having a bigger wrist with some play in it, the six digit is a no brainer. That said, I saw a guy wearing a five digit gold sub over the summer and it was really cool. I'd agree with person who said it has more character. More versatile too maybe.

behardt · 31 January 2017, 11:04 AM

I've owned both. The 6 digit is just a much more refined watch in my opinion. I like the ceramic, the glide lock. The biggest difference for me is the brushing on the case. 6 digit matches the direction of the bracelet.

All that being said, the 5 digit can be obtained for about $10K less than the 6 digit. If you really like the 5, that would be a big consideration for me.

Both are cool...

AK797 · 31 January 2017, 11:39 AM

For blue the 116618, for black the 1680/8 nipple dial.

https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t5...NDUyOA%3D%3D.2

1William · 31 January 2017, 09:16 PM

I have owned several 116618's and have always enjoyed the upgrades over the 5 digit models. As stated above the Glidelock bracelet is enough but you can add in the case the lume and the ceramic bezel.

2JHead · 31 January 2017, 10:01 PM

Right now, 6 digit. In a couple years, when the 5 digits have started the journey towards vintage stardom, 5 digit for sure.

Psmith · 31 January 2017, 10:16 PM

Another

for the 116618

Devildog · 31 January 2017, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maiden

Hi all, I know I will ultimately have to make the decision, but would appreciate some members feedback and experiences. I currently own a 114060 and a 116613lb. I prefer the six digit subs and love all the upgrades. I am currently thinking of adding a solid gold sub and I am finding I like the look of the five digit version better. I just find it a little more elegant and with a solid gold piece, the visual mass/presence might just be a little too much with the six digit version. I recently purchased a 36mm day date for this reason and I am quite happy with that vs the 40mm or DD2

So what do you think? Has anyone had the same dilemma or owned both? Cost is not an issue, so part of me thinks I would be crazy to give up the glidelock and all the upgrades. First world problems I know.

cheers

Here's a direct comparison pic. Glidelock is only an issue of you can't get a comfortable fit in the older style bracelet.

I would agree that the 5 digit is more elegant with its smaller lugs, crown guards, hands and hour markers. Also, the text is gilt on the 5 digit and white on the 6.

Don't get hung up on the bezel - whilst ceramic has its advantages, it also has disadvantages, and unless you are looking at your watch through a magnifying glass or at 10x size on a computer screen, you'll be hard pushed to tell the difference between ceramic and aluminium. They practically look the same on the wrist on gold and TT subs.

HTH

BigCFM · 31 January 2017, 10:39 PM

My pref would be the 6 digit, but if cash was a little tight I'd be more than happy to accept the 5.

Gerry62 · 1 February 2017, 12:00 AM

116618 for me

Danny83 · 1 February 2017, 12:01 AM

Xxx xxx

mjrennie · 19 February 2017, 08:48 PM

116618. Easily.

yannis · 19 February 2017, 08:53 PM

16618 has a more balanced (sexier imho) case but 116618 has all the goodies and feels heavier and more robust. Plus clasp and ceramics are significant upgrades over the 16618.
If we were talking about 1680/8 with a nipple dial then that would be another story.

natosub · 20 February 2017, 12:44 AM

There are certainly benefits both ways. The 5-digit gilt dial and smaller markers are beautiful, but the glidelock is a marvel, the ceramic bezel is awesome, and the overall heft of the 6-digit is impressive. You can't go wrong with either

s14roller · 20 February 2017, 01:27 AM

Prefer the 6 digits

douglasf13 · 20 February 2017, 02:22 AM

Chuck Taylor

vs. Chuck Taylor II

T01 · 20 February 2017, 02:29 AM

116618

Cerachrom12 · 20 February 2017, 02:55 AM

6 digit by a mile. All the upgrades make it hard for me to ever desire another 5 digit reference. Hard to beat the bigger case, larger plots, AR under the cyclops for much easier reading of date.

LuminousMaximus · 20 February 2017, 02:57 AM

Did OP already pick something up?

30 January 2017, 01:00 PM	#1
Maiden "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 3,650	11618ln vs 116618ln Hi all, I know I will ultimately have to make the decision, but would appreciate some members feedback and experiences. I currently own a 114060 and a 116613lb. I prefer the six digit subs and love all the upgrades. I am currently thinking of adding a solid gold sub and I am finding I like the look of the five digit version better. I just find it a little more elegant and with a solid gold piece, the visual mass/presence might just be a little too much with the six digit version. I recently purchased a 36mm day date for this reason and I am quite happy with that vs the 40mm or DD2 So what do you think? Has anyone had the same dilemma or owned both? Cost is not an issue, so part of me thinks I would be crazy to give up the glidelock and all the upgrades. First world problems I know. cheers __________________ Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2

30 January 2017, 01:51 PM	#8
Al1969 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 6,621	Go with the later reference . The glidelock is great. __________________ WG SUB-116719 GMT MASTER II 126719

31 January 2017, 11:04 AM	#14
behardt "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Yoda Location: USA Posts: 468	I've owned both. The 6 digit is just a much more refined watch in my opinion. I like the ceramic, the glide lock. The biggest difference for me is the brushing on the case. 6 digit matches the direction of the bracelet. All that being said, the 5 digit can be obtained for about $10K less than the 6 digit. If you really like the 5, that would be a big consideration for me. Both are cool... __________________ "The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker." Voltaire

31 January 2017, 10:16 PM	#18
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Another for the 116618 __________________

1 February 2017, 12:00 AM	#21
Gerry62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Italy Watch: Rolex Panerai Posts: 7,237	116618 for me __________________

30 January 2017, 01:25 PM	#2
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,615	Six digit for me. With thr heaviness of a solid gold watch, I want the best fit possible.

30 January 2017, 01:39 PM	#3
malarky_hk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: ... Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,466	I don't think it makes a difference between a 5 or 6 digit YG Sub - elegance would not be a word I'd associate with a YG Sub. The glide lock is reason alone to get the 6 digit reference.

30 January 2017, 01:42 PM	#4
gossbeau Banned Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Vinh Location: Lausanne/HCMC Watch: 25940ok Posts: 915	Man that was a first world problem!!! I think you should go for the latter with the glidelock. It is an awesome watch. I, however, think that since you own already 2 subs, you should try something a bit different. You can find a mint YG Yachtmaster with the blue dial for even less. You get something way less common but still with that diver look. Also, since you mentioned that you wanted something a bit more subtle. I think the size is the same than the 16618. a7ac9546d9e40d66d6f7f7881c75d822.jpg imgrc0068457689.jpg

30 January 2017, 01:46 PM	#5
Bigsykedaddy "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Real Name: Anthony Location: Florida Watch: LVc \| SubC Posts: 2,285	6 digit for me all day. Although I do agree with you on the Day Date. I originally was going to go for the 40 mm and after trying on the 36 mm I think it wears better on my wrist for that particular model.

30 January 2017, 01:47 PM	#6
bobabreath "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: N. Carolina, USA Posts: 567	I have the classic 16618 and enjoy it. The slimmer case is just more elegant than the ceramic version. Sure, Glidelock has its advantages, but if you don't find yourself needing the adjustment, there is no functional benefit. Also I like being able to easily change out the aluminum inserts. The bezel pearl of the ceramic bezel is fragile and easily damaged. I view it as the Achilles heel of the newer models.

30 January 2017, 01:56 PM	#9
GB-man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,026	For me the 1680/8 is the only choice! That said, between the two I would go 16618. Sounds like it is what you want. You should always go with your gut.

30 January 2017, 02:54 PM	#10
Flstfirider 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Casey Location: Auburn, AL Watch: Rolex, Tudor Posts: 1,136	The glide lock clasp is nice...but the 16618 has a bit more character ��

30 January 2017, 03:32 PM	#13
dadonn2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 1,557	As one of those less refined sorts who really likes the heft on their wrist, and having a bigger wrist with some play in it, the six digit is a no brainer. That said, I saw a guy wearing a five digit gold sub over the summer and it was really cool. I'd agree with person who said it has more character. More versatile too maybe.

31 January 2017, 11:39 AM	#15
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,305	For blue the 116618, for black the 1680/8 nipple dial. https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t5...NDUyOA%3D%3D.2

31 January 2017, 09:16 PM	#16
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 45,599	I have owned several 116618's and have always enjoyed the upgrades over the 5 digit models. As stated above the Glidelock bracelet is enough but you can add in the case the lume and the ceramic bezel.

31 January 2017, 10:01 PM	#17
2JHead "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Western Europe Posts: 609	Right now, 6 digit. In a couple years, when the 5 digits have started the journey towards vintage stardom, 5 digit for sure.

31 January 2017, 10:39 PM	#20
BigCFM "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Real Name: Chris Location: London Watch: this Space [ ] Posts: 1,830	My pref would be the 6 digit, but if cash was a little tight I'd be more than happy to accept the 5.

1 February 2017, 12:01 AM	#22
Danny83 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Real Name: Danny Location: Bay Area CA Watch: Yellow Gold Posts: 20,197	Xxx xxx

19 February 2017, 08:48 PM	#23
mjrennie Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: MJR Location: Midlands, UK Watch: 116618 LB Posts: 878	116618. Easily.

19 February 2017, 08:53 PM	#24
yannis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Yannis Location: Europe Watch: maniac Posts: 9,070	16618 has a more balanced (sexier imho) case but 116618 has all the goodies and feels heavier and more robust. Plus clasp and ceramics are significant upgrades over the 16618. If we were talking about 1680/8 with a nipple dial then that would be another story. __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV \| Tudor 79220N DSSD MEMBERS - OWNERS CLUB

20 February 2017, 12:44 AM	#25
natosub "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: USA Watch: the tide roll in.. Posts: 1,138	There are certainly benefits both ways. The 5-digit gilt dial and smaller markers are beautiful, but the glidelock is a marvel, the ceramic bezel is awesome, and the overall heft of the 6-digit is impressive. You can't go wrong with either

20 February 2017, 01:27 AM	#26
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,252	Prefer the 6 digits

20 February 2017, 02:22 AM	#27
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,618	Chuck Taylor vs. Chuck Taylor II

20 February 2017, 02:29 AM	#28
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,481	116618

20 February 2017, 02:55 AM	#29
Cerachrom12 Banned Join Date: Jan 2017 Real Name: Geoff Location: USA Watch: ing you! Posts: 502	6 digit by a mile. All the upgrades make it hard for me to ever desire another 5 digit reference. Hard to beat the bigger case, larger plots, AR under the cyclops for much easier reading of date.

20 February 2017, 02:57 AM	#30
LuminousMaximus "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Watch: me hit Huge Lotto Posts: 6,502	Did OP already pick something up? __________________ “Every man Dies... Not Every Man, Really Lives.” – William Wallace - To really lives means to live your life to the fullest. It means to chase your dreams, take risks, and to love life. Since everyone’s fate is the same, why not live the best life that you possibly can? In order to really live,you must seize the day. Live each day as if it's your last and overall just do it! Today is a gift, that’s why it’s called the present...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)