![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
RO vs ROO bracelet quality question - input appreciated
Hey everyone. Thinking about picking up a 42mm offshore and buying a bracelet separately. I've owned the royal oak chrono 26320/15400 and enjoy the beautiful finishing of the RO bracelet and "disco ball" effect it has in the light. My question is I am wondering if the offshore bracelet is equally as beautiful and contrasted as the standard royal oak bracelet? I don't have an AP dealer anywhere close to see in person which is why I'm seeking advice. Hard to tell from pictures..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
I would say a definite ‘no’. In fact I don’t like the Offshore bracelet although it is popular with others. The main reason that I don’t like it is that the Offshore bracelet is rounded and the Royal Oak version isn’t, the Offshore doesn’t reflect light in the same way and IMO has more of a dull appearance.
Having owned 3 42mm Offshores and moved to a 44mm I wouldn’t buy another 42, I do want a Royal Oak chrono though, partly due to the amazing bracelet. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,989
|
Take a look at this video: https://youtu.be/GhS7JluPYk0?t=606
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other… |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,834
|
Fatter and less shinny but you will still love it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Thanks for the replies guys. Really helpful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,304
|
Quote:
![]() I also like the more muscular bracelet on the 15400 than 15202. For sleek and ultra thin I'd rather the Nautilus. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
I’m extremely fond of my Panda ROO on steel. I’d say go for it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
|
I love the chunkiness of it. Even better than the Omega ones. I would think it has the same attributes as the RO ones just chunkier?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
I like the ROO bracelets. That said I wouldn't compare it to a RO bracelet as even though they are both AP, they are not that close to me either visually or in how they wear. Different, but still good.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 399
|
Bought bracelet for Elephant...it is different then one I have on Jumbo and still good, much more robust and scratch proof, on a downside watch becomes considerably heavy (think close to 300 grams) so can be difficult to wear if not used to. Love switching between leather in winter and steel in summer...Of course, good to have it since it resembles to ROO all platinum:)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 954
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 86
|
I say go for it. :D
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.