The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 December 2017, 09:40 PM   #1
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
RO vs ROO bracelet quality question - input appreciated

Hey everyone. Thinking about picking up a 42mm offshore and buying a bracelet separately. I've owned the royal oak chrono 26320/15400 and enjoy the beautiful finishing of the RO bracelet and "disco ball" effect it has in the light. My question is I am wondering if the offshore bracelet is equally as beautiful and contrasted as the standard royal oak bracelet? I don't have an AP dealer anywhere close to see in person which is why I'm seeking advice. Hard to tell from pictures..
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2017, 09:52 PM   #2
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
I would say a definite ‘no’. In fact I don’t like the Offshore bracelet although it is popular with others. The main reason that I don’t like it is that the Offshore bracelet is rounded and the Royal Oak version isn’t, the Offshore doesn’t reflect light in the same way and IMO has more of a dull appearance.

Having owned 3 42mm Offshores and moved to a 44mm I wouldn’t buy another 42, I do want a Royal Oak chrono though, partly due to the amazing bracelet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2017, 10:05 PM   #3
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,989
Take a look at this video: https://youtu.be/GhS7JluPYk0?t=606
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2017, 10:28 PM   #4
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,834
Fatter and less shinny but you will still love it ...
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 December 2017, 11:23 PM   #5
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Thanks for the replies guys. Really helpful.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2017, 12:38 AM   #6
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshAP View Post
I would say a definite ‘no’. In fact I don’t like the Offshore bracelet although it is popular with others. The main reason that I don’t like it is that the Offshore bracelet is rounded and the Royal Oak version isn’t, the Offshore doesn’t reflect light in the same way and IMO has more of a dull appearance.

Having owned 3 42mm Offshores and moved to a 44mm I wouldn’t buy another 42, I do want a Royal Oak chrono though, partly due to the amazing bracelet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I also like the more muscular bracelet on the 15400 than 15202. For sleek and ultra thin I'd rather the Nautilus.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2017, 12:59 AM   #7
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I’m extremely fond of my Panda ROO on steel. I’d say go for it
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2017, 01:10 AM   #8
Rachdanon
"TRF" Member
 
Rachdanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
I love the chunkiness of it. Even better than the Omega ones. I would think it has the same attributes as the RO ones just chunkier?
Rachdanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2017, 02:22 AM   #9
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
I like the ROO bracelets. That said I wouldn't compare it to a RO bracelet as even though they are both AP, they are not that close to me either visually or in how they wear. Different, but still good.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2018, 03:41 AM   #10
Uros
"TRF" Member
 
Uros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 399
Bought bracelet for Elephant...it is different then one I have on Jumbo and still good, much more robust and scratch proof, on a downside watch becomes considerably heavy (think close to 300 grams) so can be difficult to wear if not used to. Love switching between leather in winter and steel in summer...Of course, good to have it since it resembles to ROO all platinum:)
Uros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2018, 10:05 AM   #11
Chary
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uros View Post
Bought bracelet for Elephant...it is different then one I have on Jumbo and still good, much more robust and scratch proof, on a downside watch becomes considerably heavy (think close to 300 grams) so can be difficult to wear if not used to. Love switching between leather in winter and steel in summer...Of course, good to have it since it resembles to ROO all platinum:)
I've owned both, and I love the RO not crazy for the Offshore bracelet...
Chary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2018, 01:19 PM   #12
CLuxlover
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 86
I say go for it. :D
CLuxlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.