ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 January 2018, 05:14 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 100
|
Rolex for the active individual?
Hi TRF, first post here! I’m looking to pick up a new (to me) Rolex. I have a 6542 that my dad’s dad gifted to him when he graduated from the Air Force and I have an AP 15202. Both watches I feel are too fragile for what I want and neither do I wear all day every day. I purchased an Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean back in 09 as my first, nice watch and I’ve thrown everything at it: surfing, snowboarding, dirt bike rides, backpacking, etc. and the watch still looks great and keeps great time without a service. However, I’m looking to upgrade the Omega to a Rolex.
I’m familiar with the tried and tested criteria Rolex watches go through, but I’m curious when they started testing the watches beyond the limits the watches would ever see. I’ve narrowed my choices down to a Submariner or a Sea Dweller (40mm). I’m looking for this new watch go go everywhere with me to get knocked around and build its own character. How far back I should narrow my selection to, knowing the watch has gone through the gamut of tests the current watches now go through? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 January 2018, 07:15 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
Pics of the 6542 please.
|
11 January 2018, 08:44 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,264
|
|
11 January 2018, 08:51 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
Sub the most iconic and robust Rolex IMO
|
11 January 2018, 10:31 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,192
|
Welcome aboard
|
12 January 2018, 12:19 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Yes, let’s see that lovely 6542 and Jumbo pairing!
I’d get a 16610 rather than a 116610. It’d pair better with that 6542. |
12 January 2018, 12:53 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
|
If the Sub and SD4k are robust, then the SD43 would be even more robust and more modern.
|
12 January 2018, 01:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,611
|
I would go for the lighter sub. I didn't notice the weight of my DSSD until I ran a short distance while wearing it.
|
12 January 2018, 01:24 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,545
|
Heck, any Rolex is going to be able to do what you want it to. Your Omega did a fine job and a Rolex will, too.
You just gotta figure out which one you like. |
17 January 2018, 03:51 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 100
|
I went for the SD4k, just snagged it today. My Everest bracelet is already on its way!
For those who asked about the 6542 I have to get my post count up to post a picture...8 more posts to go! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 January 2018, 08:45 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 3,824
|
Congrats on the SD4K. Get posting - would love to see the 6542!
|
17 January 2018, 09:03 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
|
SubC with Date.
|
18 January 2018, 01:40 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,191
|
I would try on SubC, SD4k, and SD43 and see what feels /looks the best on your wrist
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
18 January 2018, 02:26 AM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,427
|
Try a DSSD, black dial, you can throw something at this one.
Rock solid over engineered watch, makes a nice change :thumbs: I just see you already made up your mind, huge congrats
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
18 January 2018, 02:45 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,594
|
Firstly a big welcome to the forum , its pretty addictive. Personally I would recommend the SubC , pretty much bulletproof .Now that's the recommendation out of the way , I cant wait to see pictures of the 6542
|
18 January 2018, 02:51 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
If I were you I’d take a look at the 16600.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
18 January 2018, 03:08 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Thailand
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 18
|
I would recommend you to consider Explorer II - based on your lifestyle :)
|
18 January 2018, 05:25 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
|
I bought my PO when it first came out 10 years ago, wore it daily, hiking mountain biking, skiing,...After 10 years, it slowed down so I have it serviced by a local Omega factory trained watchmaker. Now I barely wear it. Love that PO, it's a cool watch
I'd keep that PO and get your Sub. For daily beater, I wear my Seiko Turtle PADI which is as nice/comfortable to wear as the PO or even my Submariner, but costs half as much as the service cost for the PO ($250) Quote:
|
|
18 January 2018, 03:20 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: another planet
Posts: 608
|
With the activities you favor, consider the brittle nature of ceramic bezels vs. the steel bezel that is less likely to have catastrophic damage, but will pick up infinitely more "patina" in the way of scratches and dings.
|
18 January 2018, 03:24 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 100
|
Rolex for the active individual?
Pic of my little collection below!
|
18 January 2018, 03:30 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: J
Location: USA
Posts: 87
|
Rolex for the active individual?
Awesome collection! The SD is a nice new addition
|
18 January 2018, 03:36 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 100
|
|
18 January 2018, 05:04 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
|
Congrats on the 116600! Great watch, have mine now one year next month. Still very happy with it.
__________________
Rolex.c6 Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K Ref. 116600 |
18 January 2018, 05:17 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Congrats on Sea Dweller!!!
Great watch , I love mine... Very nice collection too ... |
18 January 2018, 05:58 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Scotland
Posts: 149
|
Explorer or Explorer II given your lifestyle. But almost all Rolex would be more than adequate. Depends on what you like the look of most.
|
18 January 2018, 09:11 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
|
What he said.!!!
__________________
The King of Cool. |
18 January 2018, 10:12 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,145
|
Congrats on the SD4000K! I’ve been wearing mine since the release in 2014. It’s my favorite daily wear and take anything you throw at it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 January 2018, 11:32 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Day Date II
Posts: 481
|
No date Sub
__________________
Day-Date II 218238 Ballon Bleu Rose Gold 2999 |
18 January 2018, 11:42 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,169
|
Nice collection! Would love to see more pics of the 6542!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.