The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 June 2020, 06:39 AM   #1
japanWatchLover
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 7
Why is the 126655 yacht master so expensive?

Just wondering, bracelet is rubber, PM out of favor, and less popular model. Think price is the limit factor on this model becoming more popular ? Even the delta between 126655 and the rose gold Daytona on oysterflex will make most just go for the Daytona. Also, at this price point they start competing w/ holy trinity watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
japanWatchLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 08:30 AM   #2
GMTSpas
"TRF" Member
 
GMTSpas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: SD43,YMRG,DYTNA500
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by japanWatchLover View Post
Just wondering, bracelet is rubber, PM out of favor, and less popular model. Think price is the limit factor on this model becoming more popular ? Even the delta between 126655 and the rose gold Daytona on oysterflex will make most just go for the Daytona. Also, at this price point they start competing w/ holy trinity watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have the 116655, obviously the 126655 has the updated movement* but aside from that, the model was groundbreaking for Rolex. They introduced the oysterflex, brought back the gilt dial and the red text. Bracelet is more than rubber, lots of people love PM, not so sure its a "less popular model"
GMTSpas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 09:11 AM   #3
kieselguhr
"TRF" Member
 
kieselguhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,528
Why is the 126655 yacht master so expensive?

The majority of people outside this community don’t overthink these things when they buy these watches.
kieselguhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 09:33 AM   #4
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,345
I tend to agree. For a little more you go OF Daytona. For less than 10K you go all gold, DD, Daytona or Sub. For me its a no brainer. Love the YM on OF but the numbers just don't make sense.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 09:37 AM   #5
socalwatchcollector
"TRF" Member
 
socalwatchcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: John
Location: newport beach
Watch: Pateks Plural
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoingPlaces View Post
I tend to agree. For a little more you go OF Daytona. For less than 10K you go all gold, DD, Daytona or Sub. For me its a no brainer. Love the YM on OF but the numbers just don't make sense.

Well said.
socalwatchcollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 10:14 AM   #6
arcentaur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Nunya
Posts: 328
Rolex really ‘guinea-pigged’ this one, including its price point.
arcentaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 10:16 AM   #7
acheronsgrief
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 724
The 116655 is amazing, and is significantly cheaper. Can be had for 19k if you’re patient. The updated movement and glidelock cost you quite a bit.

As far as MSRP I can’t image a men’s PM Rolex ever being priced under 20k, that would not be good optics imo.
acheronsgrief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 10:22 AM   #8
Brenngun
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Brenngun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,839
Because it's so damn beautiful !!!
__________________
Simple solutions solve complexed problems more often than complexed solutions solve simple problems!

Brenngun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 11:13 AM   #9
RJRJRJ
"TRF" Member
 
RJRJRJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoingPlaces View Post
I tend to agree. For a little more you go OF Daytona. For less than 10K you go all gold, DD, Daytona or Sub. For me its a no brainer. Love the YM on OF but the numbers just don't make sense.

Do you not see the irony when the OP says a 27K watch is too expensive and that you say "For less than 10K you go all gold" like 10K is nothing?
RJRJRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 11:21 AM   #10
myc ritz
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP, Speedy, Rolex
Posts: 966
Solid Everose, Amazing bezel with bearings, Glidelock Clasp, 70 hour pr. This watch has all the crazy details you don't see...and plenty that you do.

myc ritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 11:24 AM   #11
Solo118
"TRF" Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJRJRJ View Post
Do you not see the irony when the OP says a 27K watch is too expensive and that you say "For less than 10K you go all gold" like 10K is nothing?
To some it might not be, and to others they think might as well go all out with full gold while spending that kind of money. I much prefer gold on strap, as full on gold is way too out there for me.

Personally I think the 116655 is a fantastic watch, having owned one for a while I truly appreciated the "under the radar" look without having to have a full gold in your face piece. The YM was perfect for the beach or night on the town.

However I did buy it pre-owned and got it for much less than retail. At full retail, my money goes to the 116515 on OF.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 12:30 PM   #12
RyanJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,442
The answer: because people will pay it.

There's also no reason why some PM models which are mechanically the exact same as the steel model but cost $20k+ more. There's not enough precious metal to even come close to equaling that difference in cost.

Rolex knows their brand is popular and customers will line up to spend. It really is that simple.
RyanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 08:22 PM   #13
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanJ View Post
The answer: because people will pay it.

There's also no reason why some PM models which are mechanically the exact same as the steel model but cost $20k+ more. There's not enough precious metal to even come close to equaling that difference in cost.

Rolex knows their brand is popular and customers will line up to spend. It really is that simple.

Not really. Precious metals are typically harder to work with. Specifically platinum. You could easily make the argument that Rolex PM watches are a great value compared to other watch makers that offer all gold watches for the same or usually more money. Look at the spread of stainless to gold on AP or PP, it’s a lot greater than Rolex.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 09:39 PM   #14
HONDABBQ
"TRF" Member
 
HONDABBQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMTSpas View Post
I have the 116655, obviously the 126655 has the updated movement* but aside from that, the model was groundbreaking for Rolex. They introduced the oysterflex, brought back the gilt dial and the red text. Bracelet is more than rubber, lots of people love PM, not so sure its a "less popular model"
First Rolex on rubber
First Rolex with relief bezel instead of engraved
First Rolex with solid RG release
First Rolex with matte bezel
__________________
♕116400GV Z Blue
♕116622 Yacht Master Rhodium
Piaget Polo S ADLC
HONDABBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 10:20 PM   #15
faimag
"TRF" Member
 
faimag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,078
I have the 116655 and prefer it over any OF Daytona every day of the week and twice on the weekends!
And mind you, I have both SS and full PM Daytona (for some reason the endlinks on the OF Daytona look hideous in my eyes).
faimag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 10:41 PM   #16
Wingslogo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Tennessee
Watch: Sky Dweller
Posts: 631
My wife has the 37mm and it’s a killer piece !

Wish I could have this one!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wingslogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2020, 11:00 PM   #17
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by myc ritz View Post
Solid Everose, Amazing bezel with bearings, Glidelock Clasp, 70 hour pr. This watch has all the crazy details you don't see...and plenty that you do.

To date, this watch is Rolex's most striking reference. everything is special about it.
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 02:31 AM   #18
Brenngun
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Brenngun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by myc ritz View Post
Solid Everose, Amazing bezel with bearings, Glidelock Clasp, 70 hour pr. This watch has all the crazy details you don't see...and plenty that you do.

Beautiful! When you're finished with it do you mind sending this way?
__________________
Simple solutions solve complexed problems more often than complexed solutions solve simple problems!

Brenngun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 03:35 AM   #19
jack1
"TRF" Member
 
jack1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 92

I tried one on back in Feb in Boston, was very impressed by it as the colours are subtle but still has a real high end quality feel...but agree price is high, although probably justified from a materials/movement perspective compared w others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jack1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 03:50 AM   #20
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack1 View Post

I tried one on back in Feb in Boston, was very impressed by it as the colours are subtle but still has a real high end quality feel...but agree price is high, although probably justified from a materials/movement perspective compared w others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree. I’ve tried it on a few times and always came close but the price killed it for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 04:12 AM   #21
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
I was hopeful when the watch was released. Then i saw the price. Real mistake on the pricing.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram to see my watch journey @Japenney
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 04:26 AM   #22
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by japenney View Post
I was hopeful when the watch was released. Then i saw the price. Real mistake on the pricing.
Is it a mistake? I presume sales are good, seems like popular model. Seems to hold decently on grey market. I was able to get about 5% last year from my AD. Still wasn't enough though. Picked up a DD40 instead.

How is the WG 42 doing? Now that is really expensive.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 06:05 AM   #23
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by brenngun View Post
because it's so damn beautiful !!!
+1.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41Mint Green
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 08:32 AM   #24
Flybak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by myc ritz View Post
Solid Everose, Amazing bezel with bearings, Glidelock Clasp, 70 hour pr. This watch has all the crazy details you don't see...and plenty that you do.

Pricing/perceived value aside, I think it's a striking watch. Enjoy it
Flybak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 08:40 AM   #25
RoscoPico
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Watch: ingMe,WatchingYou.
Posts: 1,462
it's a valid question. why are some watches more than others in general. didn't zenith supply movements for a while, yet they don't command the same price.
how are some steel watches commanding more $ than solid gold ?
RoscoPico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 08:43 AM   #26
Yess
"TRF" Member
 
Yess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Good Hope
Watch: 124060
Posts: 1,596
Because people are willing to pay that price for it
Yess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 09:00 AM   #27
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
It's a really nice piece in person, I really like it personally.

It's certainly not for everyone, but I think the price is fair for the piece and aligns with other PM rubber models (MSRP). Yes, the consensus is why not pick the Daytona? But the Daytona isn't coveted by everyone.

You might as well say why buy a DJ, when you can buy a SS sports Rolex. Not everyone has the same taste and therefore it exists in it's niche.

The watch is a great deal on the secondary market in comparison with the other models.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 09:01 AM   #28
sechsgang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieselguhr View Post
The majority of people outside this community don’t overthink these things when they buy these watches.
This.
sechsgang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 09:15 AM   #29
WatchAmateur69
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Karuizawa
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nastie View Post
It's a really nice piece in person, I really like it personally.

It's certainly not for everyone, but I think the price is fair for the piece and aligns with other PM rubber models (MSRP). Yes, the consensus is why not pick the Daytona? But the Daytona isn't coveted by everyone.

You might as well say why buy a DJ, when you can buy a SS sports Rolex. Not everyone has the same taste and therefore it exists in it's niche.

The watch is a great deal on the secondary market in comparison with the other models.
how much on the secondary market for 126655?
WatchAmateur69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 10:03 AM   #30
startrolexendrolex
"TRF" Member
 
startrolexendrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: US
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchAmateur69 View Post
how much on the secondary market for 126655?
Not that much different then msrp.

Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk
startrolexendrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.