ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
5 February 2011, 12:25 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 81
|
Patek 5711 would be my choice
|
7 February 2011, 04:17 AM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Oliver
Location: Qatar
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 260
|
I was not too keen on the look of the YMII based on Rolex.com.
However I have seen both models at my local AD and also a WG in the wild at DOH airport arrivals. My opinion has now changed and I think that they look stunning. The GMT Master says this watch is a technical marvel and I am sure that he is right. I have never seen any piece like it. |
7 February 2011, 04:44 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
In response to longterm value, the Patek is the one of a very few brands that would have a higher resale than Rolex. 5712 most likely will only gain, while YM will only lose.
|
7 February 2011, 04:44 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
In response to longterm value, the Patek is the one of a very few brands that would have a higher resale than Rolex. 5712 most likely will only gain, while YM will only lose.
|
7 February 2011, 06:25 AM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Let me start out by saying this: I own a Patek (Aquanaut 5065) and a Rolex (Explorer II) and my Rolex is more durable, a little more comfortable, keeps better time and requires less service but if I could only have one it would be the Patek, since it's much, much more unusual and special.
Personally, I think if the OP likes the look of the YMII, he should consider the PP 5980. It's closer in price to the Rolex, but it's a really cool looking watch. I don't like the 5912 because the face is too busy and cluttered. And, while I prefer the style of my older Aquanaut, I still prefer the new Aquanaut to the Nautilus, either on the rubber strap or metal bracelet. Keep in mind, in spite of the Rolex's unique movement, you can still find similarly styled watches for much, much less. |
7 February 2011, 06:40 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
I disagree... personally if ANY of the modern Rolex's ever become "collectible" in the future and are to be considered like a vintage DRSD or Daytona... I think the YMII is the one. The reason being is if history has taught us anything, the current least desirable watch becomes one of the most wanted decades later - re: Steve McQueen ExpyII and the PN Daytona.
|
7 February 2011, 07:10 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
5712/1a
5712/1a without question. Iconic design thanks to Gerald Genta. Best movement finishing of any watch brand anywhere. The 3/4 rotor movement is exquisite and the case finishing has many very nice features that show obsessive attention to detail. And it will keep it's value exceptionally well. But I am biased as I own a 5712G.
|
7 February 2011, 07:13 AM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
|
|
7 February 2011, 07:26 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
|
YM2 in YG
|
7 February 2011, 08:30 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
7 February 2011, 08:45 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
i heavily researched getting a Patek. conculsion was: although fabulous pieces of work, they are very finicky watches and break often. plus, there are highly mixed reviews on the caliber of post-purchase product support. i.e., if u bash it against a door jamb accidentally, you may have just bought yourself a very lengthy, likely pricey, possibly attitude-laden service.
some of the automatics don't wind themselves well, and the manual winds can be easily overwound apparently. they are great pieces but u are def possibly signing up for a lot of increased hassle over a rollie. |
7 February 2011, 09:04 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
The answer it's simple, the Nautilus is the better watch.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
7 February 2011, 09:36 AM | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
Quote:
i dont like this thread anymore, since i started thinking now about getting a PP for myself..... |
|
7 February 2011, 10:12 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,170
|
i don't like the new ym2, patek is the go, but overpriced IMHO for what you get
|
7 February 2011, 10:27 AM | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
|
|
7 February 2011, 10:30 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
|
7 February 2011, 12:11 PM | #47 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Unfortunately, I've confirmed much of what was listed above, in terms of them being finicky and needing frequent service. Mine is in the shop for the second time since acquiring it about six years ago (not including the first time it stopped within a month of purchase and was replaced under warranty). Now that it's out of warranty, though, I just use a PP certified watchmaker, so it's a bit cheaper. And I am NOT an abusive wearer...
I don't know about the manual wind versions being overwound, and I can't say that I've had anything but the best experience with PP staff I've talked to, though. |
7 February 2011, 12:41 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Never had an issue with my manual Patek (5916R) being overwound. You can feel the crown tighten up when its fully wound, so you would have to be careless to keep going and do any damage.
|
7 February 2011, 01:53 PM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LA
Posts: 83
|
|
7 February 2011, 02:07 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
Ym2....
|
7 February 2011, 02:24 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
|
None of them are my style.
|
7 February 2011, 02:32 PM | #52 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: England
Watch: Milgauss Black
Posts: 288
|
Which has the best posing power? YM2
|
8 February 2011, 06:05 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
No issues with reliability or durability on my Pateks. A lot of false information in that area. As to posing power - agree on the YM. Which is why I would never own one.
|
8 February 2011, 10:21 PM | #54 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: England
Watch: Milgauss Black
Posts: 288
|
The trouble with the YM2 is the bold letters YATCH-MASTER 2 written around the bezel. I don't think many people would be totally comfortable with it in all situations. It is impossible to pose with a PP, because they are so refined.
|
9 February 2011, 01:03 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 134
|
I know this is a Rolex forum but in this case It's PP all the way!!!
__________________
You cannot defeat an ignorant man in argument |
9 February 2011, 02:00 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: NY, USA
Watch: yo self!
Posts: 2,686
|
I'm not a fan of the Patek divers, nor am I a fan of the Clownmaster II. But when you stack them up against each other, I'd go with the Patek hands down.
__________________
That boy's got the Devil in him. Rolex: I think I'm up to 9?? Omega: Got a few of those too. Breitling: And some of these. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.