The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 February 2011, 12:25 PM   #31
Cigarlvr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 81
Patek 5711 would be my choice
Cigarlvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 04:17 AM   #32
OLJR
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Oliver
Location: Qatar
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 260
I was not too keen on the look of the YMII based on Rolex.com.

However I have seen both models at my local AD and also a WG in the wild at DOH airport arrivals. My opinion has now changed and I think that they look stunning.

The GMT Master says this watch is a technical marvel and I am sure that he is right. I have never seen any piece like it.
OLJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 04:44 AM   #33
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
In response to longterm value, the Patek is the one of a very few brands that would have a higher resale than Rolex. 5712 most likely will only gain, while YM will only lose.
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 04:44 AM   #34
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
In response to longterm value, the Patek is the one of a very few brands that would have a higher resale than Rolex. 5712 most likely will only gain, while YM will only lose.
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 06:25 AM   #35
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Let me start out by saying this: I own a Patek (Aquanaut 5065) and a Rolex (Explorer II) and my Rolex is more durable, a little more comfortable, keeps better time and requires less service but if I could only have one it would be the Patek, since it's much, much more unusual and special.

Personally, I think if the OP likes the look of the YMII, he should consider the PP 5980. It's closer in price to the Rolex, but it's a really cool looking watch. I don't like the 5912 because the face is too busy and cluttered.

And, while I prefer the style of my older Aquanaut, I still prefer the new Aquanaut to the Nautilus, either on the rubber strap or metal bracelet. Keep in mind, in spite of the Rolex's unique movement, you can still find similarly styled watches for much, much less.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 06:40 AM   #36
Yazo
"TRF" Member
 
Yazo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by drtooth73 View Post
In response to longterm value, the Patek is the one of a very few brands that would have a higher resale than Rolex. 5712 most likely will only gain, while YM will only lose.
I disagree... personally if ANY of the modern Rolex's ever become "collectible" in the future and are to be considered like a vintage DRSD or Daytona... I think the YMII is the one. The reason being is if history has taught us anything, the current least desirable watch becomes one of the most wanted decades later - re: Steve McQueen ExpyII and the PN Daytona.
Yazo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 07:10 AM   #37
Le Chef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
5712/1a

5712/1a without question. Iconic design thanks to Gerald Genta. Best movement finishing of any watch brand anywhere. The 3/4 rotor movement is exquisite and the case finishing has many very nice features that show obsessive attention to detail. And it will keep it's value exceptionally well. But I am biased as I own a 5712G.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg GentaF2S.jpg (152.1 KB, 97 views)
Le Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 07:13 AM   #38
mjrennie
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexplorer2 View Post
I have never liked the design of any watch PP has ever made so it would be the YM II that gets my vote.
I agree. Rolex all the way.
mjrennie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 07:26 AM   #39
TRW
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
YM2 in YG
TRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 08:30 AM   #40
Rani Drama
"TRF" Member
 
Rani Drama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
5712/1a without question. Iconic design thanks to Gerald Genta. Best movement finishing of any watch brand anywhere. The 3/4 rotor movement is exquisite and the case finishing has many very nice features that show obsessive attention to detail. And it will keep it's value exceptionally well. But I am biased as I own a 5712G.
Drool the Patek 5712 in white gold on a strap is my absolute grail. Now just need to start a business empire.
__________________
Rani Drama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 08:45 AM   #41
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
i heavily researched getting a Patek. conculsion was: although fabulous pieces of work, they are very finicky watches and break often. plus, there are highly mixed reviews on the caliber of post-purchase product support. i.e., if u bash it against a door jamb accidentally, you may have just bought yourself a very lengthy, likely pricey, possibly attitude-laden service.

some of the automatics don't wind themselves well, and the manual winds can be easily overwound apparently.

they are great pieces but u are def possibly signing up for a lot of increased hassle over a rollie.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 09:04 AM   #42
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
The answer it's simple, the Nautilus is the better watch.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 09:36 AM   #43
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yazo View Post
I disagree... personally if ANY of the modern Rolex's ever become "collectible" in the future and are to be considered like a vintage DRSD or Daytona... I think the YMII is the one. The reason being is if history has taught us anything, the current least desirable watch becomes one of the most wanted decades later - re: Steve McQueen ExpyII and the PN Daytona.
i guess we'll see.
i dont like this thread anymore, since i started thinking now about getting a PP for myself.....
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 10:12 AM   #44
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,170
i don't like the new ym2, patek is the go, but overpriced IMHO for what you get
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 10:27 AM   #45
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchicago View Post
i heavily researched getting a Patek. conculsion was: although fabulous pieces of work, they are very finicky watches and break often. plus, there are highly mixed reviews on the caliber of post-purchase product support. i.e., if u bash it against a door jamb accidentally, you may have just bought yourself a very lengthy, likely pricey, possibly attitude-laden service.

some of the automatics don't wind themselves well, and the manual winds can be easily overwound apparently.

they are great pieces but u are def possibly signing up for a lot of increased hassle over a rollie.
All of the above is incorrect.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 10:30 AM   #46
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
But I am biased as I own a 5712G.
You are a lucky man.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 12:11 PM   #47
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paracentesis View Post
All of the above is incorrect.
Unfortunately, I've confirmed much of what was listed above, in terms of them being finicky and needing frequent service. Mine is in the shop for the second time since acquiring it about six years ago (not including the first time it stopped within a month of purchase and was replaced under warranty). Now that it's out of warranty, though, I just use a PP certified watchmaker, so it's a bit cheaper. And I am NOT an abusive wearer...

I don't know about the manual wind versions being overwound, and I can't say that I've had anything but the best experience with PP staff I've talked to, though.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 12:41 PM   #48
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
Never had an issue with my manual Patek (5916R) being overwound. You can feel the crown tighten up when its fully wound, so you would have to be careless to keep going and do any damage.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 01:53 PM   #49
Badandy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LA
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexplorer2 View Post
I have never liked the design of any watch PP has ever made so it would be the YM II that gets my vote.
Wait, what?
Badandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 02:07 PM   #50
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Ym2....
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 02:24 PM   #51
apeogre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
None of them are my style.
apeogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2011, 02:32 PM   #52
Intruder99
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: England
Watch: Milgauss Black
Posts: 288
Which has the best posing power? YM2
Intruder99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2011, 06:05 PM   #53
Le Chef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
No issues with reliability or durability on my Pateks. A lot of false information in that area. As to posing power - agree on the YM. Which is why I would never own one.
Le Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2011, 10:21 PM   #54
Intruder99
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: England
Watch: Milgauss Black
Posts: 288
The trouble with the YM2 is the bold letters YATCH-MASTER 2 written around the bezel. I don't think many people would be totally comfortable with it in all situations. It is impossible to pose with a PP, because they are so refined.
Intruder99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2011, 01:03 AM   #55
Seventh Son
"TRF" Member
 
Seventh Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 134
I know this is a Rolex forum but in this case It's PP all the way!!!
__________________
You cannot defeat an ignorant man in argument
Seventh Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2011, 02:00 AM   #56
TattooedGQ
"TRF" Member
 
TattooedGQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: NY, USA
Watch: yo self!
Posts: 2,686
I'm not a fan of the Patek divers, nor am I a fan of the Clownmaster II. But when you stack them up against each other, I'd go with the Patek hands down.
__________________
That boy's got the Devil in him.
Rolex: I think I'm up to 9??
Omega: Got a few of those too.
Breitling: And some of these.
TattooedGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.